1995 Chevrolet Blazer Problems: Brakes (1,215 Complaints)

The most-reported problem on the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is Brakes (39% of 1,215 owner reports). There are 11 safety recalls. Check the VIN and inspect Brakes — this is the NHTSA file, not a score.

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-10-16 1,215 complaints · 11 recalls

What problems show up on the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

470 of 1,215 filings named Brakes (39% of the file). That is what owners wrote, not a shop diagnosis of the vehicle in the driveway.

Second is Glass / wipers / cameras (160 reports).

There are 11 official safety recalls on this year. They were filed about Lights, Fuel system, Brakes, Suspension, Engine, and Glass / wipers / cameras. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov — a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific truck.

The 1994 has 616 reports on file; this year has 1,215. Older years collect more reports just by being on the road longer. If you need a fairer comparison, use the equal-time view.

What to check before you buy a 1995 Chevrolet Blazer

A useful visit to this page takes five minutes. YearTell does not score years and cannot see the vehicle in front of you.

  1. Look up the VIN for open recalls at nhtsa.gov. This year has 11 campaigns on file below.
  2. Brakes. Have a shop check pads, rotors, fluid and whether the pedal feels firm.
  3. Glass / wipers / cameras. Check windshield, wipers and any camera or sensor the listing claims is there.
  4. Engine. Have a shop check for oil consumption, coolant leaks, rough idle and unusual engine noise.
  5. Skim a few owner reports below for Brakes. Look for the same symptom repeating.
  6. Take that list to a mechanic. Do not turn the complaint total into a score.

What owners reported

System named most often: Brakes 470 complaints · 38.7% of the file
Crashes, fires, injuries and deaths in those filings:
  • Crashes 152
  • Fires 25
  • Injuries 83
  • Deaths 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-10-16 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Which systems owners named

Share of owner complaints filed against each vehicle system. These shares are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold.

Which systems owners named Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) appears in 470 of 1,215 owner complaints (38.7%) in this vehicle snapshot. Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES): 470 complaints, 38.7% of reports Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 79 crash reports 1 fire reports 470 · 38.7% Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY): 160 complaints, 13.2% of reports Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) 2 crash reports 160 · 13.2% Engine (ENGINE): 154 complaints, 12.7% of reports Engine (ENGINE) 2 crash reports 8 fire reports 154 · 12.7% Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM): 80 complaints, 6.6% of reports Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 1 crash reports 1 fire reports 80 · 6.6% Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM): 52 complaints, 4.3% of reports Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 4 crash reports 11 fire reports 52 · 4.3% Airbags (AIR BAGS): 51 complaints, 4.2% of reports Airbags (AIR BAGS) 44 crash reports 1 fire reports 51 · 4.2% Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN): 49 complaints, 4.0% of reports Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 1 crash reports 2 fire reports 49 · 4.0% Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL): 34 complaints, 2.8% of reports Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 6 crash reports 34 · 2.8% Body / frame (STRUCTURE): 27 complaints, 2.2% of reports Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 27 · 2.2% Unclassified NHTSA leftover: 1,033 complaints, 85.0% of reports Unclassified NHTSA leftover 134 crash reports 22 fire reports 1,033 · 85.0% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

“Unclassified NHTSA leftover” is not a car part. It is a filing bucket and always sits last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 470 38.7% 79 crashes · 1 fires
Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) 160 13.2% 2 crashes · 0 fires
Engine (ENGINE) 154 12.7% 2 crashes · 8 fires
Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 80 6.6% 1 crashes · 1 fires
Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 52 4.3% 4 crashes · 11 fires
Airbags (AIR BAGS) 51 4.2% 44 crashes · 1 fires
Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 49 4.0% 1 crashes · 2 fires
Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 34 2.8% 6 crashes · 0 fires
Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 27 2.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Unclassified NHTSA leftover 1,033 85.0% 134 crashes · 22 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-10-16 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

When reports and recalls showed up

When owners filed reports, and when recall campaigns showed up.

When reports and recalls showed up Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Jan 1995; the first recall shown was reported in Dec 1994. 1995-Q1: 10 owner reports 10 1995-Q2: 20 owner reports 20 1995-Q3: 50 owner reports 50 1995-Q4: 43 owner reports 43 1996-Q1: 30 owner reports 30 1996-Q2: 30 owner reports 30 1996-Q3: 26 owner reports 26 1996-Q4: 41 owner reports 41 1997-Q1: 28 owner reports 28 1997-Q2: 25 owner reports 25 1997-Q3: 23 owner reports 23 1997-Q4: 125 owner reports 125 1998-Q1: 63 owner reports 63 1998-Q2: 31 owner reports 31 1998-Q3: 31 owner reports 31 1998-Q4: 33 owner reports 33 1999-Q1: 45 owner reports 45 1999-Q2: 38 owner reports 38 1999-Q3: 96 owner reports 96 1999-Q4: 50 owner reports 50 2000-Q1: 34 owner reports 34 2000-Q2: 38 owner reports 38 2000-Q3: 41 owner reports 41 2000-Q4: 33 owner reports 33 2001-Q1: 27 owner reports 27 2001-Q2: 17 owner reports 17 2001-Q3: 23 owner reports 23 2001-Q4: 16 owner reports 16 2002-Q1: 20 owner reports 20 2002-Q2: 16 owner reports 16 2002-Q3: 6 owner reports 6 2002-Q4: 10 owner reports 10 2003-Q1: 19 owner reports 19 2003-Q2: 6 owner reports 6 2003-Q3: 11 owner reports 11 2003-Q4: 6 owner reports 6 2004-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2004-Q2: 6 owner reports 6 2004-Q3: 7 owner reports 7 2004-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2005-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2005-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2005-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2005-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2006-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2006-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2007-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 2007-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2008-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2009-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2010-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2011-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2012-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2013-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2014-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2016-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2018-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2019-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2019-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 Owner reports Oct 1994 Jul 2019 Recall campaign 94V242000 ◆ Recall campaign 94V242000 Recall campaign 95V080000 ◆ Recall campaign 95V080000 Recall campaign 95V180000 ◆ Recall campaign 95V180000 Recall campaign 96V234000 ◆ Recall campaign 96V234000 Recall campaign 98V150001 ◆ Recall campaign 98V150001 Recall campaign 99I006000 ◆ Recall campaign 99I006000 Recall campaign 99V193000 ◆ Recall campaign 99V193000 Recall campaign 06E023000 ◆ Recall campaign 06E023000 Recall campaign 06E041000 ◆ Recall campaign 06E041000 Recall campaign 06E043000 ◆ Recall campaign 06E043000 Recall campaign 09E012000 ◆ Recall campaign 09E012000 Investigation EA94038 ● Investigation EA94038 Investigation PE97028 ● Investigation PE97028 Investigation EA97022 ● Investigation EA97022 Investigation PE99024 ● Investigation PE99024 Investigation RQ99015 ● Investigation RQ99015 Investigation EA00008 ● Investigation EA00008 Investigation EA01019 ● Investigation EA01019 Investigation EA02006 ● Investigation EA02006
  • Campaign 95V080000 was reported 39 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 95V180000 was reported 91 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 96V234000 was reported 479 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 98V150001 was reported 1,065 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 99I006000 was reported 1,649 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 99V193000 was reported 1,649 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 06E023000 was reported 4,046 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 06E041000 was reported 3,951 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
1995-Q1 Owner reports 10
1995-Q2 Owner reports 20
1995-Q3 Owner reports 50
1995-Q4 Owner reports 43
1996-Q1 Owner reports 30
1996-Q2 Owner reports 30
1996-Q3 Owner reports 26
1996-Q4 Owner reports 41
1997-Q1 Owner reports 28
1997-Q2 Owner reports 25
1997-Q3 Owner reports 23
1997-Q4 Owner reports 125
1998-Q1 Owner reports 63
1998-Q2 Owner reports 31
1998-Q3 Owner reports 31
1998-Q4 Owner reports 33
1999-Q1 Owner reports 45
1999-Q2 Owner reports 38
1999-Q3 Owner reports 96
1999-Q4 Owner reports 50
2000-Q1 Owner reports 34
2000-Q2 Owner reports 38
2000-Q3 Owner reports 41
2000-Q4 Owner reports 33
2001-Q1 Owner reports 27
2001-Q2 Owner reports 17
2001-Q3 Owner reports 23
2001-Q4 Owner reports 16
2002-Q1 Owner reports 20
2002-Q2 Owner reports 16
2002-Q3 Owner reports 6
2002-Q4 Owner reports 10
2003-Q1 Owner reports 19
2003-Q2 Owner reports 6
2003-Q3 Owner reports 11
2003-Q4 Owner reports 6
2004-Q1 Owner reports 5
2004-Q2 Owner reports 6
2004-Q3 Owner reports 7
2004-Q4 Owner reports 2
2005-Q1 Owner reports 5
2005-Q2 Owner reports 3
2005-Q3 Owner reports 3
2005-Q4 Owner reports 2
2006-Q1 Owner reports 3
2006-Q2 Owner reports 1
2007-Q1 Owner reports 2
2007-Q4 Owner reports 2
2008-Q4 Owner reports 1
2009-Q1 Owner reports 1
2010-Q2 Owner reports 1
2011-Q4 Owner reports 2
2012-Q2 Owner reports 1
2013-Q4 Owner reports 2
2014-Q2 Owner reports 1
2016-Q2 Owner reports 1
2018-Q1 Owner reports 1
2019-Q2 Owner reports 1
2019-Q3 Owner reports 1
Recall campaign 1 94V242000
Recall campaign 1 95V080000
Recall campaign 1 95V180000
Recall campaign 1 96V234000
Recall campaign 1 98V150001
Recall campaign 1 99I006000
Recall campaign 1 99V193000
Recall campaign 1 06E023000
Recall campaign 1 06E041000
Recall campaign 1 06E043000
Recall campaign 1 09E012000
Defect investigation 1 EA94038
Defect investigation 1 PE97028
Defect investigation 1 EA97022
Defect investigation 1 PE99024
Defect investigation 1 RQ99015
Defect investigation 1 EA00008
Defect investigation 1 EA01019
Defect investigation 1 EA02006
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-10-16 Open source record

Safety Recalls (11)

Official campaigns. Each one says what could go wrong and what the dealer was told to fix.

In short, these campaigns were filed about Lights, Fuel system, Brakes, Suspension, Engine, and Glass / wipers / cameras.

  1. Recall campaign 06E023000

    Lights

    Report date
    Component:
    Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING)
    Consequence:
    WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
    Remedy:
    ANZO WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE HEADLAMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN MAY 9, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT ANZO USA AT 909-468-3688.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  2. Recall campaign 06E041000

    Fuel system

    Report date
    Component:
    Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM)
    Consequence:
    A FUEL LEAK CAN OCCUR AT THE VALVE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A FIRE.
    Remedy:
    R&B, INC. WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND AT THE CUSTOMERS REQUEST, EITHER REPLACE THE FUEL LINE OR OFFER A FULL REFUND. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 4, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT R&B, INC. AT 215-712-5330.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  3. Recall campaign 06E043000

    Safety recall 06E043000

    Report date
    Component:
    Not available in the source record
    Consequence:
    THIS CONDITION MAY CAUSE AN INADEQUATE SEAL AT THE CONNECTION, POTENTIALLY LEADING TO A FUEL LEAK. IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.
    Remedy:
    HONEYWELL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL FILTERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 18, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FRAM CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-890-2075 (OPTION 1).
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  4. Recall campaign 09E012000

    Safety recall 09E012000

    Report date
    Component:
    Not available in the source record
    Consequence:
    DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
    Remedy:
    SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  5. Recall campaign 94V242000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN A TOTAL LOSS OF BRAKINGCAPABILITY.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL INSPECT FOR HAND-STARTED BRAKE PEDAL BOLTS AND TORQUE THEM TO CORRECT SPECIFICATIONS.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  6. Recall campaign 95V080000

    Suspension

    Report date
    Component:
    Suspension (SUSPENSION)
    Consequence:
    THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE THE BALL JOINT STUD TO LOOSEN, AND FRACTURE RESULTING IN A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL RETORQUE THE UPPER BALL JOINT NUT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE VEHICLE TO THE CORRECT TORQUE VALUES.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  7. Recall campaign 95V180000

    Engine

    Report date
    Component:
    Engine (ENGINE)
    Consequence:
    IF THIS OCCURRED WHILE THE HOOD WAS OPEN, A PERSON WORKING UNDER THE HOOD OF THE VEHICLE OR IN THE VICINITY OF THE VEHICLE COULD BE STRUCK BY THE FAN BLADE AND INJURED.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE, IF NECESSARY, THE FAN WITH A NEWER FAN HAVING THICKER-HEADED RIVETS.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  8. Recall campaign 96V234000

    Fuel system

    Report date
    Component:
    Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM)
    Consequence:
    IF AN IGNITION SOURCE IS PRESENT, AND THERE IS A FUEL LEAK, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SHIELDING OF THE FUEL TANK. THIS WILL BE ADDED WITHOUT REMOVING OR DISASSEMBLING THE FUEL SYSTEM.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  9. Recall campaign 98V150001

    Glass / wipers / cameras

    Report date
    Component:
    Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY)
    Consequence:
    THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN INOPERATIVE WIPERS, REDUCING A DRIVER'S VISIBILITY, AND INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE WIPER MOTOR CIRCUIT BOARD AND COVER.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  10. Recall campaign 99I006000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    THESE VEHICLES CAN EXPERIENCE EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCES DURING ABS STOPS ON CERTAIN MULTIPLE SURFACES, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE COMPUTER PROGRAM WHICH OPERATES THE ABS UNIT ON SOME VEHICLES, OR REPLACE THE COMPUTER ON OTHERS TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ABS ON THESE SURFACES.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  11. Recall campaign 99V193000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    IF THIS OCCURRED AT A TIME WHEN MINIMUM STOPPING DISTANCE WAS REQUIRED, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPLACE OR REPAIR THE 4-WHEEL/2-WHEEL DRIVE SWITCH.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-10-16 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

What owners actually wrote

Short excerpts from the public NHTSA file. Look for the same symptom repeating.

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-10-16
Safety incident filters
Showing 8 of 1,215 complaints · page 1 of 49
2019-09-16Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM)
NHTSA ODI 11255838
CrashFireInjuryDeath
I HAD JUST PUT MY KEY IN THE IGNITION WENT TO TURN IT OVER AND NOTICED THAT MY HAZARDS WERE ON. THE SWITCH WAS IN THE OFF POSITION. I HAD TO SLIGHTLY KEEP IT PUSHED FORWARD OR IT WOULD CYCLE THROUGH THE HAZARDS, LEFT TURN SIGNAL AND RIGHT TURN SIGNAL. I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET THE PROBLEM FIXED SINCE IT JUST HAPPENED YESTERDAY
2019-04-18Engine (ENGINE)
NHTSA ODI 11197206
CrashFireInjuryDeath
ON HIGHWAY TRUCK DIES ALL SYSTEMS OFF IHAVE ALL RECEIPTS MULITPLE REPAIRS FROM THE EGR VALVE COILS FUEL PUMP SPIDER ..ALONG WITH MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL ISSUES INVOLVING THE EMERGENCY BUTTON WILL NOT TURN OFF HAD REPLACED STILL ISSUE CAME BACK, CAR WILL NOT START UNLESS SOMETHING CLICKS IN STEERING COLUMN ALSO DISTRIBUTOR AND TIMING MISSING ? I CAN GO ON ..NIGHTMARE.I LOVE MY TRUCK HOWERE I COULD HAVE GOTTEN A NEW CAR FOR THIS MUCH BUT HAVE PUT SO MUCH MONEY INTO IT AND IM A SINGLE MOM NOT ON ANY GOV ASSISTANCE OR WELFARE OR SUPPORT..PLEASE THIS TRUCK>>>>ARGH
2018-01-17Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
NHTSA ODI 11063320
CrashFireInjuryDeath
ABS FAILURE. ALL THREE ABS ISOLATION VALVES CLOSED EITHER AT START OF BREAKING OR PRIOR TO BRAKING CYCLE, RESULTING IN NO POSSIBLE DEPRESSION OF THE BRAKE PETAL AND ABSOLUTELY NO BRAKING WHAT SO EVER, LITERALLY NONE. THE VEHICLE CONTINUES AT WHATEVER SPEED THE VEHICLE WAS AT BEFORE INITIATION OF BRAKING. THIS NO BRAKE CONDITION HAPPENED INTERMITTENTLY AS SPEEDS FROM 15MPH TO HIGHWAY SPEEDS. UPON RELEASING BREAK PRESSURE (TAKING ONE'S FOOT OF THE PETAL) AND REAPPLYING THE BREAKS THE LEFT FRONT ABS ISOLATION VALVE WOULD DE-ENERGIZE AND GIVE THE DRIVER THE LEFT FRONT BREAK ONLY. THIS FAILURE WAS INTERMITTENT OVER THE LAST YEAR AND NOT WITNESSED BY ME UNTIL 1/13/2018. THE ABS FUSE WAS REMOVED AND THE BRAKES REMAIN WITHOUT ABS FUNCTION. THIS IS A MAJOR FAILURE THAT COULD HAVE CAUSED A DEADLY ACCIDENT AND MOST PROBABLY HAS. BUT, SINCE IT IS INTERMITTENT AND DEAD PEOPLE CAN'T TESTIFY YOU PROBABLY DO NOT HAVE MUCH OF A DATA BASE. ALSO, AS AN ENGINEER MYSELF, THIS IS A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE THAT SHOULD PRECIPITATE THE COMPLETE DEACTIVATION OF AUTOMATED FUNCTIONS OF ALL VEHICLES WORLDWIDE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS ALL AUTOMATED FUNCTIONS CAN BE OVERRIDDEN BY MANUAL INPUTS WITHOUT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUAL INPUTS.
2016-06-20Airbags (AIR BAGS)
NHTSA ODI 10875175
CrashFireInjuryDeath
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO AN EMBANKMENT. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED INJURIES TO THE SPINE, A WHIPLASH, AND A CONCUSSION WHICH REQUIRED MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 298,430.
2014-06-20Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
NHTSA ODI 10604751
CrashFireInjuryDeath
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED THE VEHICLE BEGAN SLIDING. NONE OF THE WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.
2013-11-19Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 10552907
CrashFireInjuryDeath
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT SHE NOTICED A GASOLINE FUEL SMELL WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS WHERE THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE FUEL TANK WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 140,000. UPDATED 12/30/13*CN
2013-11-13Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 10552172
CrashFireInjuryDeath
I HAVE GAS LEAK THAT COME FROM THE BACK OF THE CAR AND THAT IS WHEN I GET OUT OF THE BLAZER, AND IT SEEM TO BE WHEEL PROBLEM. *TR
2012-06-20Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 10460483
CrashFireInjuryDeath
1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO TWO RECALLS CONCERNING VEHICLE *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED ONE OF THE RECALLS WERE REPAIRED. HOWEVER, THE OTHER RECALL, PERTAINING TO THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM CAUSED AN AT FAULT ACCIDENT WHICH GM REJECTED, BECAUSE THE STATUTE OF LIMITATION HAD EXPIRED. *JB

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems on the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

Owners named Brakes most often — 470 of 1,215 reports (39%). That is the NHTSA file, not a diagnosis of every vehicle.

Are there recalls for the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

NHTSA lists 11 safety recall campaigns. They were filed about Lights, Fuel system, Brakes, Suspension, Engine, and Glass / wipers / cameras. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov; a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific vehicle.

What should I inspect before buying a 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

Look up the VIN for open recalls. Have a shop check pads, rotors, fluid and whether the pedal feels firm. Then skim owner filings for the same symptom and take that list to a mechanic.

Does a high complaint count mean I should skip this year?

No. Counts are reports people chose to file and they are not adjusted for sales volume. YearTell does not publish scores or a list of years to skip. Inspect the vehicle.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-10-04 Open source record

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-10-04
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-10-16 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Source: NHTSA ODI / recalls, snapshot 2026-10-16. YearTell is not a government agency.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources