1995 EAGLE TALON — Owner-Reported Problems
Verdict & Safety Summary
- Crashes 15
- Fires 6
- Injuries 6
- Deaths 1
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Component Problem Distribution
Share of owner complaints filed for each vehicle system (unaffected by sales volume)
UNKNOWN OR OTHER is an NHTSA classification artifact and is always listed last.
View component data as a table
| System / Component | Complaints | Share of Reports | Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires) |
|---|---|---|---|
| POWER TRAIN | 46 | 22.2% | 0 crashes · 1 fires |
| SUSPENSION | 46 | 22.2% | 6 crashes · 0 fires |
| ENGINE | 25 | 12.1% | 0 crashes · 1 fires |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 17 | 8.2% | 0 crashes · 4 fires |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 13 | 6.3% | 0 crashes · 0 fires |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 13 | 6.3% | 1 crashes · 0 fires |
| AIR BAGS | 12 | 5.8% | 7 crashes · 0 fires |
| SEAT BELTS | 5 | 2.4% | 0 crashes · 0 fires |
| VISIBILITY | 5 | 2.4% | 0 crashes · 0 fires |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 172 | 83.1% | 14 crashes · 5 fires |
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Problem & Recall Timeline
Observed complaint volume and manufacturer recall actions over time
- Campaign 98V069002 was reported 1,127 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 99V066003 was reported 1,448 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 00V421002 was reported 2,071 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 07E055000 was reported 4,284 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
| Date | Record type | Count | Record identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-Q1 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 1995-Q2 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 1995-Q3 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 1995-Q4 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 1996-Q1 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 1996-Q2 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 1996-Q3 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 1996-Q4 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 1997-Q1 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 1997-Q2 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 1997-Q3 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 1997-Q4 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 1998-Q1 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 1998-Q2 | Owner reports | 12 | |
| 1998-Q3 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 1998-Q4 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 1999-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 1999-Q2 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 1999-Q3 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1999-Q4 | Owner reports | 10 | |
| 2000-Q1 | Owner reports | 6 | |
| 2000-Q2 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2000-Q3 | Owner reports | 6 | |
| 2000-Q4 | Owner reports | 6 | |
| 2001-Q1 | Owner reports | 12 | |
| 2001-Q2 | Owner reports | 11 | |
| 2001-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2001-Q4 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2002-Q1 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2002-Q2 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2002-Q3 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2002-Q4 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2003-Q1 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2003-Q2 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2003-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2003-Q4 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2004-Q1 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2004-Q2 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2004-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2004-Q4 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2005-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2005-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2005-Q3 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2006-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2007-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2010-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2011-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2011-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2015-Q3 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2015-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 94V149001 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 96V158002 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 98V069002 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 99V066003 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 00V421002 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 07E055000 | |
| Defect investigation | 1 | PE97040 | |
| Defect investigation | 1 | EA98002 | |
| Defect investigation | 1 | RQ00015 |
Safety Recalls (6)
Official safety recall campaigns filed with NHTSA
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 00V421002
- Report date
- Component:
- SUSPENSION
- Consequence:
- THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE THE LOWER LATERAL ARM BALL JOINT TO SEPARATE, INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH. THIS CAMPAIGN SUPERCEDES MMC'S PREVIOUS SAFETY RECALL CAMPAIGN, SEE 99V-066.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE LOWER LATERAL ARM BALL JOINT FOR WEAR. BALL JOINTS THAT EXHIBIT WEAR BEYOND THE ESTABLISHED TOLERANCE WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEWLY DESIGNED LATERAL ARM BALL JOINTS. BALL JOINTS THAT ARE WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED TOLERANCE WILL BE CLEANED AND A SPECIAL SEALANT WILL BE APPLIED TO PREVENT INTRUSION OF MOISTURE.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 07E055000
- Report date
- Component:
- FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Consequence:
- IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FUEL LEAK COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
- Remedy:
- AIRTEX WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL PUMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING JULY 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT AIRTEX AUTOMOTIVE AT 800-880-3056.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 94V149001
- Report date
- Component:
- SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Consequence:
- LOSS OF BRAKING CAN RESULT IF THE ABS HYDRAULIC UNIT FALLS. THIS CAN RESULT IN A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL CONNECT THE ABS HYDRAULIC UNIT ATTACHMENT POINT AT A RIGID PORTION OF THE HEADLAMP SUPPORT PANEL WITH A BRACKET AND REINFORCE THE HEADLAMP SUPPORT PANEL BY ADDING A BACK PLATE.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 96V158002
- Report date
- Component:
- Not available in the source record
- Consequence:
- IF AN IGNITION SOURCE WERE PRESENT, THE FUEL LEAKAGE COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE FUEL TANK AND IF THE GASKETS ARE FOUND TO BE LEAKING, REPLACE THE FUEL TANK, CAPS AND GASKETS.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 98V069002
- Report date
- Component:
- POWER TRAIN
- Consequence:
- THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLES FOR ADEQUACY OF THE TRANSFER CASE OIL VOLUME, TRANSFER CASE OIL LEAKAGE, AND OPERATIONAL DEGRADATION OF THE TRANSFER CASE MECHANISM. IF OIL VOLUME IS INSUFFICIENT, THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF OIL WILL BE ADDED. IF THERE IS TRANSFER CASE OIL LEAKAGE, AFFECTED COMPONENTS WILL BE REPLACED. IF THE TRANSFER CASE SHOWS OPERATIONAL DEGRADATION, THE TRANSFER CASE WILL BE REPLACED.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 99V066003
- Report date
- Component:
- SUSPENSION
- Consequence:
- THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE THE LOWER LATERAL ARM BALL JOINT TO SEPARATE, INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE RUBBER BOOTS, AND IF THE BOOT IS DAMAGED, THEY WILL REPLACE THE LOWER LATERAL ARM AND BALL JOINT ON THE AFFECTED VEHICLES.
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Complaint Narrative Explorer
Verbatim owner-reported defect narratives from NHTSA public records
Estimated Ownership Cost
EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates
Adjacent Model Years
Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Methodology & Data Integrity
Data sourced from NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. Snapshot date: 2026-08-21.