2024 GMC Sierra 1500 Problems: Engine (344 Complaints)

The most-reported problem on the 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 is Engine (46% of 344 owner reports). There are 1 safety recalls. Check the VIN and inspect Engine — this is the NHTSA file, not a score.

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-09-07 344 complaints · 1 recalls

What problems show up on the 2024 GMC Sierra 1500?

158 of 344 filings named Engine (46% of the file). That is what owners wrote, not a shop diagnosis of the vehicle in the driveway.

Second is Transmission / driveline (54 reports).

There are 1 official safety recalls on this year. They were filed about Engine. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov — a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific truck.

The 2023 has 453 reports on file; this year has 344. A smaller lifetime total is not a clean bill of health. If you need a fairer comparison, use the equal-time view.

What to check before you buy a 2024 GMC Sierra 1500

A useful visit to this page takes five minutes. YearTell does not score years and cannot see the vehicle in front of you.

  1. Look up the VIN for open recalls at nhtsa.gov. This year has 1 campaigns on file below.
  2. Engine. Have a shop check for oil consumption, coolant leaks, rough idle and unusual engine noise.
  3. Transmission / driveline. Have a shop drive it and check the transmission: hard or delayed shifts, burnt-smelling fluid, and 4WD engagement if equipped.
  4. Body / frame. Look for rust, collision repair and body gaps that do not match a clean truck.
  5. Skim a few owner reports below for Engine. Look for the same symptom repeating.
  6. Take that list to a mechanic. Do not turn the complaint total into a score.

What owners reported

System named most often: Engine 158 complaints · 45.9% of the file
Crashes, fires, injuries and deaths in those filings:
  • Crashes 5
  • Fires 0
  • Injuries 6
  • Deaths 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Which systems owners named

Share of owner complaints filed against each vehicle system. These shares are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold.

Which systems owners named Engine (ENGINE) appears in 158 of 344 owner complaints (45.9%) in this vehicle snapshot. Engine (ENGINE): 158 complaints, 45.9% of reports Engine (ENGINE) 1 crash reports 158 · 45.9% Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN): 54 complaints, 15.7% of reports Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 54 · 15.7% Body / frame (STRUCTURE): 22 complaints, 6.4% of reports Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 22 · 6.4% Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM): 19 complaints, 5.5% of reports Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 19 · 5.5% Automatic braking / collision warning (FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE): 12 complaints, 3.5% of reports Automatic braking / collision warning (FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE) 1 crash reports 12 · 3.5% Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING): 11 complaints, 3.2% of reports Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING) 11 · 3.2% Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM): 11 complaints, 3.2% of reports Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 11 · 3.2% Rear camera / backup safety (BACK OVER PREVENTION): 6 complaints, 1.7% of reports Rear camera / backup safety (BACK OVER PREVENTION) 1 crash reports 6 · 1.7% Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES): 5 complaints, 1.4% of reports Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 1 crash reports 5 · 1.4% Unclassified NHTSA leftover: 74 complaints, 21.5% of reports Unclassified NHTSA leftover 3 crash reports 74 · 21.5% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

“Unclassified NHTSA leftover” is not a car part. It is a filing bucket and always sits last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
Engine (ENGINE) 158 45.9% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 54 15.7% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 22 6.4% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 19 5.5% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Automatic braking / collision warning (FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE) 12 3.5% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING) 11 3.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 11 3.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Rear camera / backup safety (BACK OVER PREVENTION) 6 1.7% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 5 1.4% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Unclassified NHTSA leftover 74 21.5% 3 crashes · 0 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

When reports and recalls showed up

When owners filed reports, and when recall campaigns showed up.

When reports and recalls showed up Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Jan 2024; the first recall shown was reported in Apr 2025. 2024-Q1: 6 owner reports 6 2024-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2024-Q3: 10 owner reports 10 2024-Q4: 19 owner reports 19 2025-Q1: 61 owner reports 61 2025-Q2: 54 owner reports 54 2025-Q3: 41 owner reports 41 2025-Q4: 32 owner reports 32 2026-Q1: 41 owner reports 41 2026-Q2: 39 owner reports 39 2026-Q3: 38 owner reports 38 Owner reports Jan 2024 Aug 2026 Recall campaign 25V274000 ◆ Recall campaign 25V274000 Investigation PE25001 ● Investigation PE25001 Investigation EA25007 ● Investigation EA25007 Investigation RQ26001 ● Investigation RQ26001 Investigation EA26005 ● Investigation EA26005
  • Campaign 25V274000 was reported 286 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
2024-Q1 Owner reports 6
2024-Q2 Owner reports 3
2024-Q3 Owner reports 10
2024-Q4 Owner reports 19
2025-Q1 Owner reports 61
2025-Q2 Owner reports 54
2025-Q3 Owner reports 41
2025-Q4 Owner reports 32
2026-Q1 Owner reports 41
2026-Q2 Owner reports 39
2026-Q3 Owner reports 38
Recall campaign 1 25V274000
Defect investigation 1 PE25001
Defect investigation 1 EA25007
Defect investigation 1 RQ26001
Defect investigation 1 EA26005
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-09-06 Open source record

Safety Recalls (1)

Official campaigns. Each one says what could go wrong and what the dealer was told to fix.

In short, these campaigns were filed about Engine.

  1. Recall campaign 25V274000

    Engine

    Report date
    Component:
    Engine (ENGINE)
    Consequence:
    Engine failure increases the risk of a crash.
    Remedy:
    Dealers will inspect the engine, and as necessary, repair or replace the engine. For vehicles that pass inspection, dealers will add higher viscosity oil, install 6 oil fill cap, replace the oil filter, and update the owner's manual. Repairs will be performed free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed June 18, 2025. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223, Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020, or GMC customer service at 1-800-462-8782. GM's number for this recall is N252494000.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

What owners actually wrote

Short excerpts from the public NHTSA file. Look for the same symptom repeating.

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-09-07
Safety incident filters
Showing 4 of 344 complaints · page 1 of 14
2026-09-03Engine (ENGINE)
NHTSA ODI 11762005
CrashFireInjuryDeath
I purchased a 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate equipped with the 6.2L V8 engine on XXX. The vehicle currently has approximately 25,000 miles. On XXX, the vehicle underwent the GM recall repair related to the 6.2L engine at Don Mealey Chevrolet. On XXX, approximately nine months after the recall repair, my family and I were traveling on the [XXX] with my two children inside the vehicle when the engine suddenly experienced a major failure. The vehicle became inoperable while we were traveling on the highway and had to be stopped and subsequently transported to Schumacher Buick GMC in [XXX]. The failure occurred unexpectedly while the vehicle was being operated normally. Having an engine failure while traveling on a major highway with my two children in the vehicle created a significant safety concern because of the potential for loss of power and the danger associated with becoming disabled in active highway traffic. GM has subsequently authorized replacement of the engine under warranty. The vehicle remains at the dealership awaiting completion of the engine replacement. I am reporting this failure because the vehicle had previously received the GM recall remedy for the 6.2L engine issue and subsequently experienced a major engine failure at only approximately 25,000 miles. The failure occurred approximately nine months after the recall repair. I am concerned that the previous recall remedy may not have adequately addressed the underlying condition associated with these 6.2L L87 engines. I am requesting that NHTSA document this failure as part of its investigation into 6.2L L87 engine failures and evaluate whether the existing recall remedy adequately addresses the safety-related engine failure condition. Vehicle information: * [XXX] GMC [XXX] 1500 Denali Ultimate * 6.2L V8 engine INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
2026-09-03Engine (ENGINE)
NHTSA ODI 11761880
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The vehicle was part of the GM L87 engine recall. The vehicle was taken to the dealership in late 2025 for recall service. The dealership inspected the vehicle for vibration and determined that it required an oil change and updated service manual to require 0W-40 oil. On June 21, 2026 the vehicle experienced an engine failure.
2026-09-02Engine (ENGINE)
NHTSA ODI 11761573
CrashFireInjuryDeath
After the initial recall inspection was performed, I was informed that my vehicle was not affected. Subsequently, the vehicle experienced a catastrophic engine failure while traveling westbound on [XXX] near [XXX], approximately one mile from [XXX]. While traveling at highway speed, the vehicle suddenly began losing speed and power. I was positioned between two semi-trucks, creating an extremely dangerous situation. At first, I looked to see if I was traveling uphill because of the unexpected loss of speed. I then pressed the accelerator in an attempt to maintain highway speed. The vehicle abruptly downshifted and the engine RPM increased dramatically. Immediately afterward, warnings appeared on the instrument cluster, including “Engine Oil Temperature High” and instructions to pull over and allow the vehicle to cool down. The vehicle continued to lose power, creating a serious risk of collision due to the surrounding highway traffic. The vehicle was subsequently towed to Findlay GMC, where it was inspected and diagnosed with a failed engine. The engine was ultimately replaced. This failure occurred after the vehicle had been inspected under the recall and I had been advised that it was not affected. I am concerned that my vehicle may have been incorrectly excluded from the recall or that the recall does not adequately identify all affected vehicles. The sudden loss of propulsion at highway speed presented a significant safety risk and warrants further investigation. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
2026-09-02Engine (ENGINE)
NHTSA ODI 11761542
CrashFireInjuryDeath
Engine stopped working while driving 65 mph on I435 Kansas City. Engine failure had to pull over in 3 lane traffic to get off of roadway. Engine just stopped working. Had towed to GM dealer who performed full engine replacement. 6.2 L . No warning. Just stopped working. Safety traveling on 3 land highway engine stopped with no warning had to work way over the shoulder with no engine.

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems on the 2024 GMC Sierra 1500?

Owners named Engine most often — 158 of 344 reports (46%). That is the NHTSA file, not a diagnosis of every vehicle.

Are there recalls for the 2024 GMC Sierra 1500?

NHTSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns. They were filed about Engine. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov; a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific vehicle.

What should I inspect before buying a 2024 GMC Sierra 1500?

Look up the VIN for open recalls. Have a shop check for oil consumption, coolant leaks, rough idle and unusual engine noise. Then skim owner filings for the same symptom and take that list to a mechanic.

Does a high complaint count mean I should skip this year?

No. Counts are reports people chose to file and they are not adjusted for sales volume. YearTell does not publish scores or a list of years to skip. Inspect the vehicle.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-08-21 Open source record

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-08-21
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Source: NHTSA ODI / recalls, snapshot 2026-09-07. YearTell is not a government agency.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources