2002 Mazda Tribute Problems and Recalls (376 Complaints)

The most-reported problem on the 2002 Mazda Tribute is Engine (29% of 376 owner reports). There are 9 safety recalls. Check the VIN and inspect Engine — this is the NHTSA file, not a score.

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-09-07 376 complaints · 9 recalls

What problems show up on the 2002 Mazda Tribute?

108 of 376 filings named Engine (29% of the file). That is what owners wrote, not a shop diagnosis of the vehicle in the driveway.

Second is Brakes (70 reports).

There are 9 official safety recalls on this year. They were filed about Transmission / driveline, Cruise / speed control, Brakes, Body / frame, and Suspension. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov — a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific truck.

The 2001 has 550 reports on file; this year has 376. A smaller lifetime total is not a clean bill of health. If you need a fairer comparison, use the equal-time view.

What to check before you buy a 2002 Mazda Tribute

A useful visit to this page takes five minutes. YearTell does not score years and cannot see the vehicle in front of you.

  1. Look up the VIN for open recalls at nhtsa.gov. This year has 9 campaigns on file below.
  2. Engine. Have a shop check for oil consumption, coolant leaks, rough idle and unusual engine noise.
  3. Brakes. Have a shop check pads, rotors, fluid and whether the pedal feels firm.
  4. Airbags. Confirm the airbag light behaves normally and that open airbag recalls are closed.
  5. Skim a few owner reports below for Engine. Look for the same symptom repeating.
  6. Take that list to a mechanic. Do not turn the complaint total into a score.

What owners reported

System named most often: Engine 108 complaints · 28.7% of the file
Crashes, fires, injuries and deaths in those filings:
  • Crashes 18
  • Fires 24
  • Injuries 13
  • Deaths 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Which systems owners named

Share of owner complaints filed against each vehicle system. These shares are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold.

Which systems owners named Engine (ENGINE) appears in 108 of 376 owner complaints (28.7%) in this vehicle snapshot. Engine (ENGINE): 108 complaints, 28.7% of reports Engine (ENGINE) 1 crash reports 6 fire reports 108 · 28.7% Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES): 70 complaints, 18.6% of reports Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 12 fire reports 70 · 18.6% Airbags (AIR BAGS): 33 complaints, 8.8% of reports Airbags (AIR BAGS) 6 crash reports 33 · 8.8% Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM): 29 complaints, 7.7% of reports Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 1 crash reports 3 fire reports 29 · 7.7% Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN): 27 complaints, 7.2% of reports Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 2 crash reports 27 · 7.2% Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL): 27 complaints, 7.2% of reports Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 7 crash reports 1 fire reports 27 · 7.2% Body / frame (STRUCTURE): 19 complaints, 5.0% of reports Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 19 · 5.0% Steering (STEERING): 9 complaints, 2.4% of reports Steering (STEERING) 1 crash reports 9 · 2.4% Suspension (SUSPENSION): 8 complaints, 2.1% of reports Suspension (SUSPENSION) 8 · 2.1% Unclassified NHTSA leftover: 223 complaints, 59.3% of reports Unclassified NHTSA leftover 5 crash reports 12 fire reports 223 · 59.3% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

“Unclassified NHTSA leftover” is not a car part. It is a filing bucket and always sits last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
Engine (ENGINE) 108 28.7% 1 crashes · 6 fires
Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 70 18.6% 0 crashes · 12 fires
Airbags (AIR BAGS) 33 8.8% 6 crashes · 0 fires
Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 29 7.7% 1 crashes · 3 fires
Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 27 7.2% 2 crashes · 0 fires
Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 27 7.2% 7 crashes · 1 fires
Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 19 5.0% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Steering (STEERING) 9 2.4% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Suspension (SUSPENSION) 8 2.1% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Unclassified NHTSA leftover 223 59.3% 5 crashes · 12 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

When reports and recalls showed up

When owners filed reports, and when recall campaigns showed up.

When reports and recalls showed up Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Oct 2001; the first recall shown was reported in Apr 2004. 2001-Q4: 8 owner reports 8 2002-Q1: 11 owner reports 11 2002-Q2: 27 owner reports 27 2002-Q3: 38 owner reports 38 2002-Q4: 12 owner reports 12 2003-Q1: 13 owner reports 13 2003-Q2: 15 owner reports 15 2003-Q3: 21 owner reports 21 2003-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 2004-Q1: 8 owner reports 8 2004-Q2: 7 owner reports 7 2004-Q3: 6 owner reports 6 2004-Q4: 7 owner reports 7 2005-Q1: 11 owner reports 11 2005-Q2: 5 owner reports 5 2005-Q3: 6 owner reports 6 2005-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2006-Q1: 4 owner reports 4 2006-Q2: 5 owner reports 5 2006-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2006-Q4: 7 owner reports 7 2007-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 2007-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2007-Q3: 7 owner reports 7 2007-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2008-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2008-Q2: 4 owner reports 4 2008-Q3: 4 owner reports 4 2008-Q4: 7 owner reports 7 2009-Q1: 6 owner reports 6 2009-Q2: 4 owner reports 4 2009-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2009-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2010-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2010-Q2: 4 owner reports 4 2010-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2010-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2011-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 2011-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2011-Q3: 6 owner reports 6 2011-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 2012-Q1: 11 owner reports 11 2012-Q2: 11 owner reports 11 2012-Q3: 7 owner reports 7 2012-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 2013-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2013-Q2: 5 owner reports 5 2013-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2013-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2014-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2014-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2014-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2014-Q4: 6 owner reports 6 2015-Q1: 6 owner reports 6 2015-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2015-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2015-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2016-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2016-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2016-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2017-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2017-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2017-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2018-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2018-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2018-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2019-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2020-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2021-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2022-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2022-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2023-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 Owner reports Oct 2001 Oct 2023 Recall campaign 04V175000 ◆ Recall campaign 04V175000 Recall campaign 04V583000 ◆ Recall campaign 04V583000 Recall campaign 04V605000 ◆ Recall campaign 04V605000 Recall campaign 07E023000 ◆ Recall campaign 07E023000 Recall campaign 07V157000 ◆ Recall campaign 07V157000 Recall campaign 12V016000 ◆ Recall campaign 12V016000 Recall campaign 12V357000 ◆ Recall campaign 12V357000 Recall campaign 14V174000 ◆ Recall campaign 14V174000 Recall campaign 15E045000 ◆ Recall campaign 15E045000 Investigation PE01043 ● Investigation PE01043 Investigation EA02027 ● Investigation EA02027 Investigation PE06048 ● Investigation PE06048 Investigation DP09003 ● Investigation DP09003 Investigation RQ09002 ● Investigation RQ09002 Investigation EA10002 ● Investigation EA10002 Investigation DP12005 ● Investigation DP12005 Investigation PE12019 ● Investigation PE12019
  • Campaign 04V175000 was reported 729 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 04V583000 was reported 1,031 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 04V605000 was reported 1,143 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 07E023000 was reported 1,969 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 07V157000 was reported 1,981 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 12V016000 was reported 3,727 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 14V174000 was reported 4,390 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 15E045000 was reported 4,674 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
2001-Q4 Owner reports 8
2002-Q1 Owner reports 11
2002-Q2 Owner reports 27
2002-Q3 Owner reports 38
2002-Q4 Owner reports 12
2003-Q1 Owner reports 13
2003-Q2 Owner reports 15
2003-Q3 Owner reports 21
2003-Q4 Owner reports 4
2004-Q1 Owner reports 8
2004-Q2 Owner reports 7
2004-Q3 Owner reports 6
2004-Q4 Owner reports 7
2005-Q1 Owner reports 11
2005-Q2 Owner reports 5
2005-Q3 Owner reports 6
2005-Q4 Owner reports 2
2006-Q1 Owner reports 4
2006-Q2 Owner reports 5
2006-Q3 Owner reports 3
2006-Q4 Owner reports 7
2007-Q1 Owner reports 2
2007-Q2 Owner reports 2
2007-Q3 Owner reports 7
2007-Q4 Owner reports 1
2008-Q1 Owner reports 3
2008-Q2 Owner reports 4
2008-Q3 Owner reports 4
2008-Q4 Owner reports 7
2009-Q1 Owner reports 6
2009-Q2 Owner reports 4
2009-Q3 Owner reports 2
2009-Q4 Owner reports 3
2010-Q1 Owner reports 3
2010-Q2 Owner reports 4
2010-Q3 Owner reports 2
2010-Q4 Owner reports 1
2011-Q1 Owner reports 2
2011-Q2 Owner reports 1
2011-Q3 Owner reports 6
2011-Q4 Owner reports 4
2012-Q1 Owner reports 11
2012-Q2 Owner reports 11
2012-Q3 Owner reports 7
2012-Q4 Owner reports 4
2013-Q1 Owner reports 1
2013-Q2 Owner reports 5
2013-Q3 Owner reports 1
2013-Q4 Owner reports 3
2014-Q1 Owner reports 1
2014-Q2 Owner reports 2
2014-Q3 Owner reports 3
2014-Q4 Owner reports 6
2015-Q1 Owner reports 6
2015-Q2 Owner reports 3
2015-Q3 Owner reports 2
2015-Q4 Owner reports 1
2016-Q1 Owner reports 1
2016-Q2 Owner reports 2
2016-Q3 Owner reports 1
2017-Q2 Owner reports 1
2017-Q3 Owner reports 1
2017-Q4 Owner reports 1
2018-Q1 Owner reports 1
2018-Q2 Owner reports 2
2018-Q4 Owner reports 2
2019-Q3 Owner reports 3
2020-Q2 Owner reports 1
2021-Q3 Owner reports 1
2022-Q1 Owner reports 1
2022-Q4 Owner reports 1
2023-Q4 Owner reports 2
Recall campaign 1 04V175000
Recall campaign 1 04V583000
Recall campaign 1 04V605000
Recall campaign 1 07E023000
Recall campaign 1 07V157000
Recall campaign 1 12V016000
Recall campaign 1 12V357000
Recall campaign 1 14V174000
Recall campaign 1 15E045000
Defect investigation 1 PE01043
Defect investigation 1 EA02027
Defect investigation 1 PE06048
Defect investigation 1 DP09003
Defect investigation 1 RQ09002
Defect investigation 1 EA10002
Defect investigation 1 DP12005
Defect investigation 1 PE12019
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-09-06 Open source record

Safety Recalls (9)

Official campaigns. Each one says what could go wrong and what the dealer was told to fix.

In short, these campaigns were filed about Transmission / driveline, Cruise / speed control, Brakes, Body / frame, and Suspension.

  1. Recall campaign 04V175000

    Transmission / driveline

    Report date
    Component:
    Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN)
    Consequence:
    SHOULD THE ENGINE STALL, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPROGRAM THE POWER CONTROL MODULE (PCM) WITH THE APPROPRIATE CALIBRATION. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 3, 2004. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT MAZDA AT 1-800-222-5500.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  2. Recall campaign 04V583000

    Cruise / speed control

    Report date
    Component:
    Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL)
    Consequence:
    AN UNEXPECTED INCREASE IN ENGINE IDLE SPEED MAY INCREASE STOPPING DISTANCE AND MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE ACCELERATOR CABLE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JANUARY 28, 2005. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT MAZDA AT 1-800-222-5500, OPTION #4.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  3. Recall campaign 04V605000

    Safety recall 04V605000

    Report date
    Component:
    Unclassified NHTSA leftover
    Consequence:
    IF THE LIFTGATE IS LEFT UNLOCKED, THERE IS THE POTENTIAL THAT IT MAY OPEN DURING A CRASH.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE REAR LIFTGATE LATCH RELEASE ROD, THE RELEASE ROD ATTACHMENT CLIP AND THE DOOR HANDLE RETURN SPRING. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 31, 2005. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT MAZDA AT 1-800-222-5500.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  4. Recall campaign 07E023000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    LOSS OF BRAKE FLUID CAN RESULT IN POOR BRAKING PERFORMANCE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
    Remedy:
    CARDONE WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE ANY DEFECTIVE MASTER CYLINDERS. THE RECALL BEGAN DURING APRIL 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT CARDONE AT 1-800-777-4780.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  5. Recall campaign 07V157000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    AN ELECTRICAL SHORT MIGHT CAUSE AN ABS MALFUNCTION THAT WOULD ILLUMINATE THE ABS WARNING LIGHT, AND IN SOME CASES, THE MODULE MAY OVERHEAT RESULTING IN BURNING ODOR, SMOKE, AND/OR FIRE. THIS CONDITION COULD OCCUR EITHER WHEN THE VEHICLE IGNITION SWITCH IS IN THE OFF POSITION OR WHILE THE VEHICLE IS BEING OPERATED.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE WIRE HARNESS CONNECTOR TO THE ABS MODULE FOR MISSING OR DISLODGED WIRE SEALS, AND REPAIR OR REPLACE THE HARNESS CONNECTOR AS APPROPRIATE. THE DEALER WILL ALSO INSPECT THE CONNECTOR ON THE ABS MODULE AND REPLACE IT IF IT IS FOUND TO BE CORRODED OR DAMAGED. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 9, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT MAZDA AT 1-800-222-5500.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  6. Recall campaign 12V016000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    CORROSION MAY DEVELOP IN THE ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR LEADING MELTING, SMOKING OR POSSIBLE FIRE.
    Remedy:
    MAZDA WILL NOTIFY OWNERS, AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE VEHICLE'S BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER RESERVOIR CAP AND MODIFY THE ABS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, FREE OF CHARGE. UNTIL THE REPAIR HAS BEEN PERFORMED, VEHICLE OWNERS SHOULD PARK THEIR VEHICLES OUTSIDE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JUNE 22, 2012. OWNERS MAY CONTACT MAZDA AT 1-800-222-5500, OPTION 6.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  7. Recall campaign 12V357000

    Safety recall 12V357000

    Report date
    Component:
    Not available in the source record
    Consequence:
    A stuck throttle may result in very high vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop or slow the vehicle, which could cause a crash, serious injury or death.
    Remedy:
    Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will repair the vehicles by increasing the engine cover clearance, free of charge. Remedy parts are now available. The safety recall began on September 13, 2012. Owners may contact Mazda Customer Assistance Center at 1-800-222-5500, option #6.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  8. Recall campaign 14V174000

    Body / frame

    Report date
    Component:
    Body / frame (STRUCTURE)
    Consequence:
    A separation of the lower control arm can result in a significant loss of steering control, increasing the risk of a crash.
    Remedy:
    Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will install a newly designed reinforcement cross-brace, free of charge. The recall began on May 29, 2014. Owners may contact Mazda at 1-800-222-5500. Mazda's number for this recall is 7514D.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  9. Recall campaign 15E045000

    Suspension

    Report date
    Component:
    Suspension (SUSPENSION)
    Consequence:
    Use of an incorrectly sized wheel bearing can adversely affect the braking and steering of the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
    Remedy:
    Timken has begun notifying distributors who will offer purchasers replacement wheel bearings, free of charge. The recall began on May 21, 2015. Owners may contact Timken customer service at 1-866-984-6536.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

What owners actually wrote

Short excerpts from the public NHTSA file. Look for the same symptom repeating.

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-09-07
Safety incident filters
Showing 4 of 376 complaints · page 1 of 16
2023-11-22Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 11556495
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The contact owns a 2002 Mazda Tribute. The contact stated that the check engine warning light was illuminated. Additionally, the contact stated that while driving at various speeds, the transmission was shifting erratically and made an abnormal rumbling sound. The contact stated that the vehicle hesitated to respond and was jerking upon depressing the accelerator pedal. The contact who is an independent mechanic had replaced the transmission speed sensor, the transmission shift position sensor, the vehicle speed sensor, the shift solenoid block, the transmission fluid, the transmission clutch solenoid, and the wheel speed sensor; however, the failure persisted. The contact used an OBD scanner and retrieved DTC codes indicating that the ABS wiring was overheating. The contact later became aware that the VIN was included in NHTSA Campaign Number: 12V016000 (Service Brakes, Hydraulic). The vehicle was taken to the dealer for the recall repair; however, the dealer bypassed the ABS module. The contact stated that while driving 40 MPH to the residence after the repair, the failure recurred. The contact stated that the recall repair did not involve bypassing the ABS module. The dealer was contacted, but no further assistance was provided. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, and several cases were opened; however, no assistance was provided. The failure mileage was approximately 162,000.
2023-10-13Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM)
NHTSA ODI 11549734
CrashFireInjuryDeath
My car has had a abs engine code for a year that I have spent a lot of money trying to get it off because, I can’t renew my tag because it failed emissions vehicle safety test . So I was notified by my insurance company that my vehicle was under recall. I read it and called Mazda and it was confirmed and I went to the shop and I waited 6 hours for the installation of a new abs module and wire harness. Hennesy Mazda of morrow Georgia bypassed the abs system but replaced my voltage regulator with out my consent. The recall recommended repair is to replace the abs module and harness. The dealership refused to comply and neither offered a tow back to Newnan Georgia where I live. So they placed me and others at risk by failing to comply. I have been ignored even after speaking with 3 customer service representatives and I was given a call [XXX] 10/11/23. I was told that I had to get it to Marietta Jim Ellis Mazda and that they would contact me but know one has called. I need your help to resolve this serious violation of the recall and the altering of my vehicles abs by bypassing it 😳🙄. I have lost a total of $2,367 in parts lost wages and anguish due to their lack of compliance of the recall of my 2002 Mazda tribute es abs module and harness. The abs module and wiring to ECM gets the voltage regulator hot and causes abs engine light to illuminate and malfunction. This my work vehicle I need it to make a living. The abs module and harness wasn’t changed but was bypassed 😳. The recall clearly states the issue and recommended repairs by vehicle manufacturer or authorized dealer. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
2022-12-16Suspension (SUSPENSION)
NHTSA ODI 11497822
CrashFireInjuryDeath
My vehicle took off and accelerated without me depressing the gas pedal and it was very scary and hard to get stopped I was doing almost 80 mph. It had a safety recall for the throttle cable for this but you show no open recalls yet Mazda does and told me if recalls we're taken care of they would show up on the car fax which they do not my vehicle is a 2002 but this doesn't mean it was ever fixed has several other issues also the front lower control arm which is also on a recall and does not show on the car fax the entire front end on the passenger side sounds like it's really loose and could break and my tire come loose as others have reported when filing same complaint. This has happened more than once to me. I call it now a death trap I need help to get this safe to drive thank you.
2022-03-01Steering (STEERING)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 11454744
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The contact owns a 2002 Mazda Tribute. The contact stated while driving approximately 45 MPH, the steering wheel felt as if it was detached from the steering column. Additionally, there was a grinding noise coming from the passenger’s side front wheel well. The contact did not notice any warning lights. The contact was able to drive the vehicle safely back to his residence. The vehicle was not taken to the local dealer. The contact referenced NHTSA Campaign Number: 14V174000 (Structure) however, the VIN was not included in the recall. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer had not been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 95,000.

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems on the 2002 Mazda Tribute?

Owners named Engine most often — 108 of 376 reports (29%). That is the NHTSA file, not a diagnosis of every vehicle.

Are there recalls for the 2002 Mazda Tribute?

NHTSA lists 9 safety recall campaigns. They were filed about Transmission / driveline, Cruise / speed control, Brakes, Body / frame, and Suspension. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov; a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific vehicle.

What should I inspect before buying a 2002 Mazda Tribute?

Look up the VIN for open recalls. Have a shop check for oil consumption, coolant leaks, rough idle and unusual engine noise. Then skim owner filings for the same symptom and take that list to a mechanic.

Does a high complaint count mean I should skip this year?

No. Counts are reports people chose to file and they are not adjusted for sales volume. YearTell does not publish scores or a list of years to skip. Inspect the vehicle.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-08-21 Open source record

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-08-21
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Source: NHTSA ODI / recalls, snapshot 2026-09-07. YearTell is not a government agency.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources