2017 Subaru Crosstrek Problems and Recalls (93 Complaints)

The most-reported problem on the 2017 Subaru Crosstrek is Glass / wipers / cameras (24% of 93 owner reports). There are 1 safety recalls. Check the VIN and inspect Glass / wipers / cameras — this is the NHTSA file, not a score.

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-09-07 93 complaints · 1 recalls

What problems show up on the 2017 Subaru Crosstrek?

22 of 93 filings named Glass / wipers / cameras (24% of the file). That is what owners wrote, not a shop diagnosis of the vehicle in the driveway.

Second is Electrical (8 reports).

There are 1 official safety recalls on this year. They were filed about Lights. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov — a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific truck.

The 2016 has 131 reports on file; this year has 93. A smaller lifetime total is not a clean bill of health. If you need a fairer comparison, use the equal-time view.

What to check before you buy a 2017 Subaru Crosstrek

A useful visit to this page takes five minutes. YearTell does not score years and cannot see the vehicle in front of you.

  1. Look up the VIN for open recalls at nhtsa.gov. This year has 1 campaigns on file below.
  2. Glass / wipers / cameras. Check windshield, wipers and any camera or sensor the listing claims is there.
  3. Electrical. Have a shop scan for stored codes and check battery, charging and any warning lights that stay on.
  4. Transmission / driveline. Have a shop drive it and check the transmission: hard or delayed shifts, burnt-smelling fluid, and 4WD engagement if equipped.
  5. Skim a few owner reports below for Glass / wipers / cameras. Look for the same symptom repeating.
  6. Take that list to a mechanic. Do not turn the complaint total into a score.

What owners reported

System named most often: Glass / wipers / cameras 22 complaints · 23.7% of the file
Crashes, fires, injuries and deaths in those filings:
  • Crashes 5
  • Fires 2
  • Injuries 5
  • Deaths 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Which systems owners named

Share of owner complaints filed against each vehicle system. These shares are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold.

Which systems owners named Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) appears in 22 of 93 owner complaints (23.7%) in this vehicle snapshot. Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY): 22 complaints, 23.7% of reports Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) 22 · 23.7% Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM): 8 complaints, 8.6% of reports Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 1 crash reports 8 · 8.6% Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN): 8 complaints, 8.6% of reports Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 1 crash reports 8 · 8.6% Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES): 4 complaints, 4.3% of reports Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 1 crash reports 4 · 4.3% Wheels (WHEELS): 4 complaints, 4.3% of reports Wheels (WHEELS) 4 · 4.3% Engine (ENGINE): 3 complaints, 3.2% of reports Engine (ENGINE) 3 · 3.2% Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING): 3 complaints, 3.2% of reports Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING) 3 · 3.2% Airbags (AIR BAGS): 2 complaints, 2.2% of reports Airbags (AIR BAGS) 2 · 2.2% Steering (STEERING): 2 complaints, 2.2% of reports Steering (STEERING) 2 · 2.2% Unclassified NHTSA leftover: 39 complaints, 41.9% of reports Unclassified NHTSA leftover 2 crash reports 2 fire reports 39 · 41.9% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

“Unclassified NHTSA leftover” is not a car part. It is a filing bucket and always sits last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) 22 23.7% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 8 8.6% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 8 8.6% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 4 4.3% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Wheels (WHEELS) 4 4.3% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Engine (ENGINE) 3 3.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING) 3 3.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Airbags (AIR BAGS) 2 2.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Steering (STEERING) 2 2.2% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Unclassified NHTSA leftover 39 41.9% 2 crashes · 2 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

When reports and recalls showed up

When owners filed reports, and when recall campaigns showed up.

When reports and recalls showed up Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Jul 2017; the first recall shown was reported in Feb 2019. 2017-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2017-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2018-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2018-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2018-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2019-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 2019-Q2: 6 owner reports 6 2019-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2019-Q4: 13 owner reports 13 2020-Q1: 8 owner reports 8 2020-Q2: 11 owner reports 11 2020-Q3: 7 owner reports 7 2020-Q4: 7 owner reports 7 2021-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2021-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2021-Q3: 4 owner reports 4 2021-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2022-Q1: 4 owner reports 4 2022-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2022-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2022-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2023-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 2023-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2024-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2025-Q3: 2 owner reports 2 2025-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 Owner reports Jul 2017 Oct 2025 Recall campaign 19V149000 ◆ Recall campaign 19V149000
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
2017-Q3 Owner reports 1
2017-Q4 Owner reports 2
2018-Q2 Owner reports 1
2018-Q3 Owner reports 2
2018-Q4 Owner reports 1
2019-Q1 Owner reports 2
2019-Q2 Owner reports 6
2019-Q3 Owner reports 2
2019-Q4 Owner reports 13
2020-Q1 Owner reports 8
2020-Q2 Owner reports 11
2020-Q3 Owner reports 7
2020-Q4 Owner reports 7
2021-Q1 Owner reports 5
2021-Q2 Owner reports 3
2021-Q3 Owner reports 4
2021-Q4 Owner reports 1
2022-Q1 Owner reports 4
2022-Q2 Owner reports 1
2022-Q3 Owner reports 1
2022-Q4 Owner reports 1
2023-Q1 Owner reports 2
2023-Q3 Owner reports 2
2024-Q1 Owner reports 3
2025-Q3 Owner reports 2
2025-Q4 Owner reports 1
Recall campaign 1 19V149000
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-09-06 Open source record

Safety Recalls (1)

Official campaigns. Each one says what could go wrong and what the dealer was told to fix.

In short, these campaigns were filed about Lights.

  1. Recall campaign 19V149000

    Lights

    Report date
    Component:
    Lights (EXTERIOR LIGHTING)
    Consequence:
    Brake lights that do not illuminate properly will not alert other drivers that the vehicle is slowing or stopping, increasing the risk of crash.
    Remedy:
    Subaru will notify owners, and dealers will replace the brake light switch, free of charge. The recall began April 15, 2019. Owners may contact Subaru customer service at 1-844-373-6614. Subaru's number for this recall is WUE-90.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

What owners actually wrote

Short excerpts from the public NHTSA file. Look for the same symptom repeating.

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-09-07
Safety incident filters
Showing 3 of 93 complaints · page 1 of 4
2025-10-22Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN)
NHTSA ODI 11694927
CrashFireInjuryDeath
Premature shift fork failure in 2017 Subaru Crosstrek manual transmission at 62,521 miles requiring complete transmission replacement ($10,000 repair, vehicle worth $11,000). EVIDENCE OF DESIGN DEFECT: - Subaru issued TSB 03-83-20R acknowledging shift fork design flaws in 2018-2020 Crosstreks with identical transmission - TSB states original forks required "thicker nylon inserts" proving inadequate design - My VIN (HG269902) is before production change (LG225906), confirming defective pre-improvement design - Shift fork failure can cause sudden inability to shift gears while driving - significant safety hazard MAINTENANCE: Single owner, meticulously maintained with documented service at 20k, 39k, 52k, 58k miles. Never in accident. No abuse. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE: Subaru offered only $1,800 (18% coverage) and blamed my "driving habits" despite TSB proving design defect. REQUEST: NHTSA investigate shift fork failures in 2015-2017 Crosstreks and evaluate if TSB 03-83-20R should extend to these model years. See attached: Complete complaint documentation and TSB 03-83-20R.
2025-09-30VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
NHTSA ODI 11690682
CrashFireInjuryDeath
In August of 2024, I got into my car in a parking lot and turned the key in the ignition. The car started revving really high. I waited for it to slow down, and then I put it into reverse. The car shot back and would have hit the building if I hadn't slammed on the brakes. Fortunately, there wasn't anyone behind the car at the time, but the woman who had just walked in back of my car to enter the building stood there looking at me. I slowly put my foot on the gas pedal and drove home. The following day, I had a tow truck come and take the car to the dealer. They did a scheduled maintenance service and replace the throttle body. Everything was fine until 9/28/25. I was driving out of a parking lot and entering the street going very slowly, suddenly the car lurched forward very fast, and I had to slam on my brakes to stop it. I drove it home. I notified a friend who knew a mechanic that he said was familiar with this type of issue. He got in touch with the dealership where the car had been serviced, and I got a call from the Service Department manager. He asked me to bring the car in so they could try to find out what the problem was. He said that if they couldn't find out what it was, an engineer might be called in to inspect the car. I am planning on having the car towed to the dealership this week. On neither occasion did any warning lights come on in the car. It was very fortunate that no one was hurt during either incident, but it could have been tragic. I was only about 15 feet away from a crosswalk when the second incident occurred. I read online that the manufacturer is involved in a lawsuit where several other people have had the same experience, although not the same model as my car. I have driven the same brand of car for about fifteen years and have never had a problem before.
2025-08-02Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 11678003
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The harness on my child's Nuna RAVA loosened during a 30 minute drive home (highway and downtown driving) in May of 2025. I learned later that month that there is a recall on Nuna Ravas for that exact reason. It is available for inspection. My child was not properly secured, and I did not know it until we got home; he could have been killed or seriously injured had we gotten into a collision on that drive. The car seat has not been inspected by anyone. Nuna offered me a “remedy kit” with a screwdriver, a brush, and a mismatched fabric cover, but I am not a safety technician and do not have the time or expertise to take the seat apart myself and still trust it to secure my child. The problem with the harness straps we have is intermittent, and does not replicate when the car is parked and I simply “tug” on the straps. I do not feel that this is an adequate safety test anyway, as it doesn’t replicate the forces or conditions in an accident. I requested a replacement seat, but Nuna denied my request on 7/21 and again on 7/28. Nuna has not supplied crash test results on layperson “repaired” car seats. This defect is the subject of NHTSA actions DP24003 and PE24026. Other RAVA owners have complained that their repaired RAVA still malfunctioned even after using Nuna's "remedy kit." I would like a replacement car seat to ensure my child's safety.

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems on the 2017 Subaru Crosstrek?

Owners named Glass / wipers / cameras most often — 22 of 93 reports (24%). That is the NHTSA file, not a diagnosis of every vehicle.

Are there recalls for the 2017 Subaru Crosstrek?

NHTSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns. They were filed about Lights. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov; a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific vehicle.

What should I inspect before buying a 2017 Subaru Crosstrek?

Look up the VIN for open recalls. Check windshield, wipers and any camera or sensor the listing claims is there. Then skim owner filings for the same symptom and take that list to a mechanic.

Does a high complaint count mean I should skip this year?

No. Counts are reports people chose to file and they are not adjusted for sales volume. YearTell does not publish scores or a list of years to skip. Inspect the vehicle.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-08-21 Open source record

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-08-21
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Source: NHTSA ODI / recalls, snapshot 2026-09-07. YearTell is not a government agency.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources