2004 Toyota Tacoma Problems: Body / frame (411 Complaints)

The most-reported problem on the 2004 Toyota Tacoma is Body / frame (40% of 411 owner reports). There are 5 safety recalls. Check the VIN and inspect Body / frame — this is the NHTSA file, not a score.

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-09-07 411 complaints · 5 recalls

What problems show up on the 2004 Toyota Tacoma?

164 of 411 filings named Body / frame (40% of the file). That is what owners wrote, not a shop diagnosis of the vehicle in the driveway.

Second is Suspension (57 reports).

There are 5 official safety recalls on this year. They were filed about Seat belts, Suspension, and Tires. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov — a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific truck.

The 2003 has 354 reports on file; this year has 411. Older years collect more reports just by being on the road longer. If you need a fairer comparison, use the equal-time view.

What to check before you buy a 2004 Toyota Tacoma

A useful visit to this page takes five minutes. YearTell does not score years and cannot see the vehicle in front of you.

  1. Look up the VIN for open recalls at nhtsa.gov. This year has 5 campaigns on file below.
  2. Body / frame. Look for rust, collision repair and body gaps that do not match a clean truck.
  3. Suspension. Listen for clunks over bumps and look at tire wear for alignment issues.
  4. Cruise / speed control. Test cruise control and ask about unintended-acceleration reports on this year.
  5. Skim a few owner reports below for Body / frame. Look for the same symptom repeating.
  6. Take that list to a mechanic. Do not turn the complaint total into a score.

What owners reported

System named most often: Body / frame 164 complaints · 39.9% of the file
Crashes, fires, injuries and deaths in those filings:
  • Crashes 27
  • Fires 3
  • Injuries 21
  • Deaths 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Which systems owners named

Share of owner complaints filed against each vehicle system. These shares are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold.

Which systems owners named Body / frame (STRUCTURE) appears in 164 of 411 owner complaints (39.9%) in this vehicle snapshot. Body / frame (STRUCTURE): 164 complaints, 39.9% of reports Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 3 crash reports 1 fire reports 164 · 39.9% Suspension (SUSPENSION): 57 complaints, 13.9% of reports Suspension (SUSPENSION) 5 crash reports 57 · 13.9% Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL): 24 complaints, 5.8% of reports Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 3 crash reports 24 · 5.8% Steering (STEERING): 21 complaints, 5.1% of reports Steering (STEERING) 21 · 5.1% Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM): 19 complaints, 4.6% of reports Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 1 fire reports 19 · 4.6% Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN): 15 complaints, 3.7% of reports Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 15 · 3.7% Engine (ENGINE): 14 complaints, 3.4% of reports Engine (ENGINE) 1 crash reports 14 · 3.4% Airbags (AIR BAGS): 12 complaints, 2.9% of reports Airbags (AIR BAGS) 7 crash reports 12 · 2.9% Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES): 12 complaints, 2.9% of reports Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 2 crash reports 12 · 2.9% Unclassified NHTSA leftover: 249 complaints, 60.6% of reports Unclassified NHTSA leftover 11 crash reports 3 fire reports 249 · 60.6% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

“Unclassified NHTSA leftover” is not a car part. It is a filing bucket and always sits last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
Body / frame (STRUCTURE) 164 39.9% 3 crashes · 1 fires
Suspension (SUSPENSION) 57 13.9% 5 crashes · 0 fires
Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 24 5.8% 3 crashes · 0 fires
Steering (STEERING) 21 5.1% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 19 4.6% 0 crashes · 1 fires
Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 15 3.7% 0 crashes · 0 fires
Engine (ENGINE) 14 3.4% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Airbags (AIR BAGS) 12 2.9% 7 crashes · 0 fires
Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 12 2.9% 2 crashes · 0 fires
Unclassified NHTSA leftover 249 60.6% 11 crashes · 3 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

When reports and recalls showed up

When owners filed reports, and when recall campaigns showed up.

When reports and recalls showed up Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Oct 2003; the first recall shown was reported in May 2004. 2003-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2004-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2004-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2004-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2004-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2005-Q1: 7 owner reports 7 2005-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2005-Q3: 7 owner reports 7 2005-Q4: 9 owner reports 9 2006-Q1: 8 owner reports 8 2006-Q2: 4 owner reports 4 2006-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2006-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2007-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2007-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2007-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2008-Q1: 4 owner reports 4 2008-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2008-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2009-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2009-Q2: 4 owner reports 4 2009-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2009-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2010-Q1: 9 owner reports 9 2010-Q2: 4 owner reports 4 2010-Q3: 4 owner reports 4 2010-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2011-Q1: 6 owner reports 6 2011-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2012-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2012-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2012-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2012-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 2013-Q1: 14 owner reports 14 2013-Q2: 6 owner reports 6 2013-Q3: 17 owner reports 17 2013-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2014-Q1: 7 owner reports 7 2014-Q2: 12 owner reports 12 2014-Q3: 10 owner reports 10 2014-Q4: 14 owner reports 14 2015-Q1: 12 owner reports 12 2015-Q2: 12 owner reports 12 2015-Q3: 13 owner reports 13 2015-Q4: 13 owner reports 13 2016-Q1: 11 owner reports 11 2016-Q2: 14 owner reports 14 2016-Q3: 8 owner reports 8 2016-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2017-Q1: 7 owner reports 7 2017-Q2: 17 owner reports 17 2017-Q3: 5 owner reports 5 2017-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2018-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2018-Q2: 6 owner reports 6 2018-Q3: 5 owner reports 5 2018-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 2019-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2019-Q2: 10 owner reports 10 2019-Q3: 5 owner reports 5 2019-Q4: 6 owner reports 6 2020-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2020-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2020-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2020-Q4: 7 owner reports 7 2021-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2021-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2021-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2022-Q1: 4 owner reports 4 2022-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2022-Q3: 5 owner reports 5 2022-Q4: 3 owner reports 3 2023-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 2023-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2024-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2024-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2025-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 2025-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2025-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2026-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 Owner reports Oct 2003 Jan 2026 Recall campaign 04V214000 ◆ Recall campaign 04V214000 Recall campaign 05V225000 ◆ Recall campaign 05V225000 Recall campaign 06E026000 ◆ Recall campaign 06E026000 Recall campaign 06E065000 ◆ Recall campaign 06E065000 Recall campaign 12V542000 ◆ Recall campaign 12V542000
  • Campaign 05V225000 was reported 245 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 12V542000 was reported 3,151 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
2003-Q4 Owner reports 1
2004-Q1 Owner reports 1
2004-Q2 Owner reports 2
2004-Q3 Owner reports 3
2004-Q4 Owner reports 3
2005-Q1 Owner reports 7
2005-Q2 Owner reports 2
2005-Q3 Owner reports 7
2005-Q4 Owner reports 9
2006-Q1 Owner reports 8
2006-Q2 Owner reports 4
2006-Q3 Owner reports 1
2006-Q4 Owner reports 2
2007-Q1 Owner reports 3
2007-Q3 Owner reports 1
2007-Q4 Owner reports 3
2008-Q1 Owner reports 4
2008-Q2 Owner reports 1
2008-Q3 Owner reports 1
2009-Q1 Owner reports 1
2009-Q2 Owner reports 4
2009-Q3 Owner reports 1
2009-Q4 Owner reports 3
2010-Q1 Owner reports 9
2010-Q2 Owner reports 4
2010-Q3 Owner reports 4
2010-Q4 Owner reports 3
2011-Q1 Owner reports 6
2011-Q4 Owner reports 1
2012-Q1 Owner reports 3
2012-Q2 Owner reports 3
2012-Q3 Owner reports 3
2012-Q4 Owner reports 4
2013-Q1 Owner reports 14
2013-Q2 Owner reports 6
2013-Q3 Owner reports 17
2013-Q4 Owner reports 3
2014-Q1 Owner reports 7
2014-Q2 Owner reports 12
2014-Q3 Owner reports 10
2014-Q4 Owner reports 14
2015-Q1 Owner reports 12
2015-Q2 Owner reports 12
2015-Q3 Owner reports 13
2015-Q4 Owner reports 13
2016-Q1 Owner reports 11
2016-Q2 Owner reports 14
2016-Q3 Owner reports 8
2016-Q4 Owner reports 2
2017-Q1 Owner reports 7
2017-Q2 Owner reports 17
2017-Q3 Owner reports 5
2017-Q4 Owner reports 3
2018-Q1 Owner reports 5
2018-Q2 Owner reports 6
2018-Q3 Owner reports 5
2018-Q4 Owner reports 4
2019-Q1 Owner reports 3
2019-Q2 Owner reports 10
2019-Q3 Owner reports 5
2019-Q4 Owner reports 6
2020-Q1 Owner reports 5
2020-Q2 Owner reports 3
2020-Q3 Owner reports 1
2020-Q4 Owner reports 7
2021-Q1 Owner reports 5
2021-Q2 Owner reports 2
2021-Q4 Owner reports 3
2022-Q1 Owner reports 4
2022-Q2 Owner reports 1
2022-Q3 Owner reports 5
2022-Q4 Owner reports 3
2023-Q1 Owner reports 5
2023-Q2 Owner reports 2
2024-Q1 Owner reports 1
2024-Q4 Owner reports 2
2025-Q2 Owner reports 2
2025-Q3 Owner reports 1
2025-Q4 Owner reports 1
2026-Q1 Owner reports 2
Recall campaign 1 04V214000
Recall campaign 1 05V225000
Recall campaign 1 06E026000
Recall campaign 1 06E065000
Recall campaign 1 12V542000
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-09-06 Open source record

Safety Recalls (5)

Official campaigns. Each one says what could go wrong and what the dealer was told to fix.

In short, these campaigns were filed about Seat belts, Suspension, and Tires.

  1. Recall campaign 04V214000

    Seat belts

    Report date
    Component:
    Seat belts (SEAT BELTS)
    Consequence:
    THIS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS HAVE REPLACED THE SEAT BELTS. NO VEHICLES WERE SOLD TO CONSUMERS.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  2. Recall campaign 05V225000

    Suspension

    Report date
    Component:
    Suspension (SUSPENSION)
    Consequence:
    THE LOWER BALL JOINT MAY SEPARATE FROM THE KNUCKLE CAUSING LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL AND A CRASH COULD OCCUR.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER BALL JOINTS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 5, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  3. Recall campaign 06E026000

    Safety recall 06E026000

    Report date
    Component:
    Not available in the source record
    Consequence:
    WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
    Remedy:
    PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  4. Recall campaign 06E065000

    Safety recall 06E065000

    Report date
    Component:
    Not available in the source record
    Consequence:
    LACK OF AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS IN THE LAMPS WILL DECREASE LIGHTING VISIBILITY TO OTHER DRIVERS AND MAY POSSIBLY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
    Remedy:
    AJ MOTORSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 31, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT AJ MOTORSPORT AT 626-618-2026.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  5. Recall campaign 12V542000

    Tires

    Report date
    Component:
    Tires (TIRES)
    Consequence:
    Corrosion of the plate could cause it to break, which could result in detachment of the spare tire from the vehicle. Detachment of the spare tire could result in a road hazard which may increase the risk of a vehicle crash.
    Remedy:
    Toyota will notify owners, dealers will inspect the vehicle and replace the spare tire carrier lift plate as necessary, free of charge. The recall began in February 2013. Owners may contact their Toyota dealer or the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

What owners actually wrote

Short excerpts from the public NHTSA file. Look for the same symptom repeating.

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-09-07
Safety incident filters
Showing 5 of 411 complaints · page 1 of 17
2026-03-25Body / frame (STRUCTURE)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 11726891
CrashFireInjuryDeath
Immediately after the manufacturer recall requiring full frame replacement (completed November 2017 by the same dealership referenced below), the vehicle developed abnormal handling not present before the repair, including improper tracking and rear end instability. No warning lights/diagnostic messages were present. These issues were reported to the servicing dealership within weeks and repeatedly over the following years. Despite multiple short initial inspections and two extended service periods—totaling approximately fourteen months in the dealership’s possession—the dealership repeatedly reported no defect found and continued to advise that the vehicle was safe to operate. Due to ongoing safety concerns, an independent inspection was recently obtained. It confirmed measurable rear axle offset and a thrust angle deviation outside acceptable tolerances. The defect is visually apparent: the rear wheels are not symmetrically aligned, and the vehicle exhibits a noticeable “crab walking” effect when viewed from behind. The root cause remains undetermined and would require further diagnostic work and significant disassembly. All documentation and inspection findings are available upon request. Safety risk: The vehicle does not track correctly and shows instability, especially in low traction conditions such as rain or snow, increasing the risk of loss of control. The manufacturer has been formally notified through repeated outreach, including ongoing contact with the Brand Engagement Center since December 2025 and multiple certified letters to Toyota North America Legal/Consumer Affairs between January and March 2026. The only response received was a generic statement from the Brand Engagement Center indicating that the vehicle is out of warranty and an offer to return it to the same dealership that performed the frame replacement and failed to identify the defect. No other response, investigation, or resolution has been provided by Toyota North America.
2026-02-14Suspension (SUSPENSION)
NHTSA ODI 11717952
CrashFireInjuryDeath
I was turning into a gas station and all the sudden the vehicle came to a complete stop i was unable to move the vehicle and sat there until the tow truck was able to show up. Looked under the vehicle and on the passenger side front suspension the lower ball joint was no longer where it belongs.
2025-11-01Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN)
NHTSA ODI 11696970
CrashFireInjuryDeath
My 2004 Toyota Tacoma was part of the frame replacement back in the fall of 2018 when Bobby Rahal Toyota in Mechanicsburg, PA has by truck for over 6 months while they replaced my frame. It has been determined that my rear differential is rusted and is now to the point of needing replaced. For over the last year I have tried working with Bobby Rahal to come to and understanding on having this repaired due to the fact that my mechanic believes that this rust is in fact the same issue as the frame and should have been replaced when the frame was. All they will tell me is that the recall is closed and there is nothing they can do. Very disappointed in the fact that this was handled when it should have been. Now I am stuck trying to figure out how to pay for this myself. I have taken very good care of my truck for over 21 years and there is no reason for me to have to pay out of pocket for something that they should have taken care of during the recall. I don't have a lift to check the underneath of my truck, I trust when there is a recall that the dealership will do its job and fix everything safely and not put an unsafe vehicle back on the road and wait until a vehicle rusts completely through. Bobby Rahal was also inspecting the truck at this time so they knew the rear differential was rusted. My current mechanic said the Rear differential has been rusted since the time they replaced the frame and and has been for many years. It is irresponsible for Bobby Rahal Toyota to have not replaced the Rear differential axel knowing it was rusted and unsafe.
2025-09-18Body / frame (STRUCTURE)Unclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 11688089
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The frame broke
2025-06-18TIRESUnclassified NHTSA leftover
NHTSA ODI 11667780
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The contact owns a 2004 Toyota Tacoma equipped with Toyo Tires, Tire Line: Open Country HT, Tire Size: 265/70/R16, DOT Number: CXLJA881918. The contact stated while driving at various speeds, the steering wheel was shuddering significantly. The vehicle was taken to Walmart for the tires to be balanced and the wheels rotated. The mechanic informed the contact that the service could not be performed because the front tires were out of round, the tires belts were separated, and the tire beads were fractured. The tires were not replaced. The tires were replacement tires. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the tire warranties were not transferable from the previous owner. The vehicle failure mileage was approximately 144,549. The tires failure mileage was approximately 20,000. The VIN was not available.

Toyota Tacoma Complaints and Recalls by Year

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems on the 2004 Toyota Tacoma?

Owners named Body / frame most often — 164 of 411 reports (40%). That is the NHTSA file, not a diagnosis of every vehicle.

Are there recalls for the 2004 Toyota Tacoma?

NHTSA lists 5 safety recall campaigns. They were filed about Seat belts, Suspension, and Tires. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov; a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific vehicle.

What should I inspect before buying a 2004 Toyota Tacoma?

Look up the VIN for open recalls. Look for rust, collision repair and body gaps that do not match a clean truck. Then skim owner filings for the same symptom and take that list to a mechanic.

Does a high complaint count mean I should skip this year?

No. Counts are reports people chose to file and they are not adjusted for sales volume. YearTell does not publish scores or a list of years to skip. Inspect the vehicle.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-08-21 Open source record

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-08-21
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-09-07 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Source: NHTSA ODI / recalls, snapshot 2026-09-07. YearTell is not a government agency.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources