1995 CHEVROLET LUMINA — Owner-Reported Problems
Verdict & Safety Summary
- Crashes 50
- Fires 8
- Injuries 45
- Deaths 6
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Component Problem Distribution
Share of owner complaints filed for each vehicle system (unaffected by sales volume)
UNKNOWN OR OTHER is an NHTSA classification artifact and is always listed last.
View component data as a table
| System / Component | Complaints | Share of Reports | Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VISIBILITY | 84 | 17.2% | 2 crashes · 0 fires |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 63 | 12.9% | 9 crashes · 0 fires |
| POWER TRAIN | 51 | 10.5% | 1 crashes · 1 fires |
| ENGINE | 49 | 10.0% | 0 crashes · 2 fires |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 32 | 6.6% | 0 crashes · 4 fires |
| AIR BAGS | 27 | 5.5% | 24 crashes · 0 fires |
| STRUCTURE | 23 | 4.7% | 1 crashes · 0 fires |
| SUSPENSION | 23 | 4.7% | 2 crashes · 0 fires |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 22 | 4.5% | 0 crashes · 0 fires |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 400 | 82.0% | 44 crashes · 5 fires |
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Problem & Recall Timeline
Observed complaint volume and manufacturer recall actions over time
- Campaign 97V017000 was reported 748 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 97V065000 was reported 696 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 98V306000 was reported 1,288 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 07E021000 was reported 4,231 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
| Date | Record type | Count | Record identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-Q1 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 1995-Q2 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1995-Q3 | Owner reports | 11 | |
| 1995-Q4 | Owner reports | 9 | |
| 1996-Q1 | Owner reports | 16 | |
| 1996-Q2 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1996-Q3 | Owner reports | 11 | |
| 1996-Q4 | Owner reports | 11 | |
| 1997-Q1 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 1997-Q2 | Owner reports | 17 | |
| 1997-Q3 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 1997-Q4 | Owner reports | 17 | |
| 1998-Q1 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1998-Q2 | Owner reports | 12 | |
| 1998-Q3 | Owner reports | 14 | |
| 1998-Q4 | Owner reports | 20 | |
| 1999-Q1 | Owner reports | 22 | |
| 1999-Q2 | Owner reports | 21 | |
| 1999-Q3 | Owner reports | 30 | |
| 1999-Q4 | Owner reports | 15 | |
| 2000-Q1 | Owner reports | 15 | |
| 2000-Q2 | Owner reports | 20 | |
| 2000-Q3 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 2000-Q4 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 2001-Q1 | Owner reports | 24 | |
| 2001-Q2 | Owner reports | 9 | |
| 2001-Q3 | Owner reports | 11 | |
| 2001-Q4 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2002-Q1 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 2002-Q2 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 2002-Q3 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 2002-Q4 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 2003-Q1 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2003-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2003-Q3 | Owner reports | 9 | |
| 2003-Q4 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2004-Q1 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2004-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2004-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2004-Q4 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2005-Q1 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2005-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2005-Q3 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2005-Q4 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2006-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2006-Q3 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2006-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2007-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2008-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2008-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2008-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2009-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2010-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2011-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2014-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2014-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 94V230000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 95V030000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 95V214000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 97V017000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 97V065000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 98V306000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 07E021000 |
Safety Recalls (7)
Official safety recall campaigns filed with NHTSA
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 07E021000
- Report date
- Component:
- FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER
- Consequence:
- FUEL MAY LEAK, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A FIRE.
- Remedy:
- DELPHI WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE UPR FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 23, 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT DELPHI AT 877-411-8770.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 94V230000
- Report date
- Component:
- SUSPENSION
- Consequence:
- IF THE BALL JOINT FRACTURED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION, LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL TO THE VEHICLE CAN OCCUR.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE RIGHT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM AND BALL JOINT STUD ON ALL INVOLVED VEHICLES.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 95V030000
- Report date
- Component:
- STEERING
- Consequence:
- INADEQUATE TORQUE CAN CAUSE THESE BOLTS TO VIBRATE, LOOSEN, OR FALL OUT RESULTING IN LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL AND INCREASE THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL RETORQUE THE STEERING COLUMN SUPPORT BRACKET ATTACHING BOLTS TO THE CORRECT SPECIFICATIONS.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 95V214000
- Report date
- Component:
- Not available in the source record
- Consequence:
- CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: THE THROTTLE MAY FAITL TO RETURN QUICKLY CAUSING THE ENGINE SPEED TO NOT DECREASE TO A LEVEL ANTICIPATED BY THE DRIVER.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE THROTTLE CABLE SUPPORT BRACKET.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 97V017000
- Report date
- Component:
- VISIBILITY
- Consequence:
- THIS CAN CAUSE THE WINDSHIELD WASHER/WIPER TO WORK INTERMITTENTLY AND COULD ULTIMATELY RESULT IN INOPERATIVE WIPERS. IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR IN A SEVERE WEATHER SITUATION, DRIVER VISIBILITY COULD BE REDUCED, INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE THE OLD DESIGNED WASHER/WIPER SWITCHES WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED SWITCH.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 97V065000
- Report date
- Component:
- SEAT BELTS
- Consequence:
- IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE SEAT BELT SYSTEM CAN FRACTURE AND INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT CAN OCCUR.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE CENTER REAR SEAT BELT SYSTEM.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 98V306000
- Report date
- Component:
- SEAT BELTS
- Consequence:
- IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE SEAT BELT SYSTEM CAN FRACTURE, INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE CENTER REAR SEAT BELT SYSTEM.
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Complaint Narrative Explorer
Verbatim owner-reported defect narratives from NHTSA public records
Estimated Ownership Cost
EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates
Adjacent Model Years
Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Methodology & Data Integrity
Data sourced from NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. Snapshot date: 2026-08-21.