2013 Ford F-150 Problems: Transmission / driveline (2,984 Complaints)

The most-reported problem on the 2013 Ford F-150 is Transmission / driveline (37% of 2,984 owner reports). There are 3 safety recalls. Check the VIN and inspect Transmission / driveline — this is the NHTSA file, not a score.

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-10-15 2,984 complaints · 3 recalls

What problems show up on the 2013 Ford F-150?

1,102 of 2,984 filings named Transmission / driveline (37% of the file). That is what owners wrote, not a shop diagnosis of the vehicle in the driveway.

Second is Brakes (325 reports).

There are 3 official safety recalls on this year. They were filed about Brakes and Transmission / driveline. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov — a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific truck.

The 2012 has 1,773 reports on file; this year has 2,984. Older years collect more reports just by being on the road longer. If you need a fairer comparison, use the equal-time view.

What to check before you buy a 2013 Ford F-150

A useful visit to this page takes five minutes. YearTell does not score years and cannot see the vehicle in front of you.

  1. Look up the VIN for open recalls at nhtsa.gov. This year has 3 campaigns on file below.
  2. Transmission / driveline. Have a shop drive it and check the transmission: hard or delayed shifts, burnt-smelling fluid, and 4WD engagement if equipped.
  3. Brakes. Have a shop check pads, rotors, fluid and whether the pedal feels firm.
  4. Engine. Have a shop check for oil consumption, coolant leaks, rough idle and unusual engine noise.
  5. Skim a few owner reports below for Transmission / driveline. Look for the same symptom repeating.
  6. Take that list to a mechanic. Do not turn the complaint total into a score.

What owners reported

System named most often: Transmission / driveline 1,102 complaints · 36.9% of the file
Crashes, fires, injuries and deaths in those filings:
  • Crashes 78
  • Fires 35
  • Injuries 64
  • Deaths 4
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-10-14 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Which systems owners named

Share of owner complaints filed against each vehicle system. These shares are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold.

Which systems owners named Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) appears in 1,102 of 2,984 owner complaints (36.9%) in this vehicle snapshot. Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN): 1,102 complaints, 36.9% of reports Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 18 crash reports 2 fire reports 1,102 · 36.9% Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES): 325 complaints, 10.9% of reports Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 24 crash reports 1 fire reports 325 · 10.9% Engine (ENGINE): 323 complaints, 10.8% of reports Engine (ENGINE) 1 crash reports 9 fire reports 323 · 10.8% Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL): 228 complaints, 7.6% of reports Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 6 crash reports 228 · 7.6% Steering (STEERING): 196 complaints, 6.6% of reports Steering (STEERING) 7 crash reports 196 · 6.6% Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY): 173 complaints, 5.8% of reports Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) 2 fire reports 173 · 5.8% Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM): 148 complaints, 5.0% of reports Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 1 crash reports 11 fire reports 148 · 5.0% Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM): 112 complaints, 3.8% of reports Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 2 fire reports 112 · 3.8% Wheels (WHEELS): 40 complaints, 1.3% of reports Wheels (WHEELS) 1 crash reports 40 · 1.3% Unclassified NHTSA leftover: 453 complaints, 15.2% of reports Unclassified NHTSA leftover 8 crash reports 11 fire reports 453 · 15.2% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

“Unclassified NHTSA leftover” is not a car part. It is a filing bucket and always sits last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN) 1,102 36.9% 18 crashes · 2 fires
Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES) 325 10.9% 24 crashes · 1 fires
Engine (ENGINE) 323 10.8% 1 crashes · 9 fires
Cruise / speed control (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL) 228 7.6% 6 crashes · 0 fires
Steering (STEERING) 196 6.6% 7 crashes · 0 fires
Glass / wipers / cameras (VISIBILITY) 173 5.8% 0 crashes · 2 fires
Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) 148 5.0% 1 crashes · 11 fires
Fuel system (FUEL SYSTEM) 112 3.8% 0 crashes · 2 fires
Wheels (WHEELS) 40 1.3% 1 crashes · 0 fires
Unclassified NHTSA leftover 453 15.2% 8 crashes · 11 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-10-15 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

When reports and recalls showed up

When owners filed reports, and when recall campaigns showed up.

When reports and recalls showed up Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Oct 2012; the first recall shown was reported in May 2016. 2012-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2013-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 2013-Q2: 46 owner reports 46 2013-Q3: 56 owner reports 56 2013-Q4: 28 owner reports 28 2014-Q1: 23 owner reports 23 2014-Q2: 31 owner reports 31 2014-Q3: 29 owner reports 29 2014-Q4: 17 owner reports 17 2015-Q1: 29 owner reports 29 2015-Q2: 20 owner reports 20 2015-Q3: 23 owner reports 23 2015-Q4: 32 owner reports 32 2016-Q1: 66 owner reports 66 2016-Q2: 63 owner reports 63 2016-Q3: 55 owner reports 55 2016-Q4: 49 owner reports 49 2017-Q1: 53 owner reports 53 2017-Q2: 54 owner reports 54 2017-Q3: 53 owner reports 53 2017-Q4: 69 owner reports 69 2018-Q1: 122 owner reports 122 2018-Q2: 82 owner reports 82 2018-Q3: 89 owner reports 89 2018-Q4: 125 owner reports 125 2019-Q1: 190 owner reports 190 2019-Q2: 144 owner reports 144 2019-Q3: 76 owner reports 76 2019-Q4: 64 owner reports 64 2020-Q1: 53 owner reports 53 2020-Q2: 33 owner reports 33 2020-Q3: 45 owner reports 45 2020-Q4: 40 owner reports 40 2021-Q1: 46 owner reports 46 2021-Q2: 44 owner reports 44 2021-Q3: 33 owner reports 33 2021-Q4: 34 owner reports 34 2022-Q1: 45 owner reports 45 2022-Q2: 32 owner reports 32 2022-Q3: 52 owner reports 52 2022-Q4: 42 owner reports 42 2023-Q1: 52 owner reports 52 2023-Q2: 26 owner reports 26 2023-Q3: 60 owner reports 60 2023-Q4: 35 owner reports 35 2024-Q1: 49 owner reports 49 2024-Q2: 78 owner reports 78 2024-Q3: 74 owner reports 74 2024-Q4: 52 owner reports 52 2025-Q1: 69 owner reports 69 2025-Q2: 82 owner reports 82 2025-Q3: 55 owner reports 55 2025-Q4: 36 owner reports 36 2026-Q1: 41 owner reports 41 2026-Q2: 48 owner reports 48 2026-Q3: 31 owner reports 31 2026-Q4: 5 owner reports 5 Owner reports Oct 2012 Oct 2026 Recall campaign 16V345000 ◆ Recall campaign 16V345000 Recall campaign 19V075000 ◆ Recall campaign 19V075000 Recall campaign 19V433000 ◆ Recall campaign 19V433000 Investigation PE13018 ● Investigation PE13018 Investigation PE16003 ● Investigation PE16003 Investigation RQ17010 ● Investigation RQ17010
  • Campaign 16V345000 was reported 1,106 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 19V075000 was reported 2,123 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 19V433000 was reported 2,242 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
2012-Q4 Owner reports 1
2013-Q1 Owner reports 3
2013-Q2 Owner reports 46
2013-Q3 Owner reports 56
2013-Q4 Owner reports 28
2014-Q1 Owner reports 23
2014-Q2 Owner reports 31
2014-Q3 Owner reports 29
2014-Q4 Owner reports 17
2015-Q1 Owner reports 29
2015-Q2 Owner reports 20
2015-Q3 Owner reports 23
2015-Q4 Owner reports 32
2016-Q1 Owner reports 66
2016-Q2 Owner reports 63
2016-Q3 Owner reports 55
2016-Q4 Owner reports 49
2017-Q1 Owner reports 53
2017-Q2 Owner reports 54
2017-Q3 Owner reports 53
2017-Q4 Owner reports 69
2018-Q1 Owner reports 122
2018-Q2 Owner reports 82
2018-Q3 Owner reports 89
2018-Q4 Owner reports 125
2019-Q1 Owner reports 190
2019-Q2 Owner reports 144
2019-Q3 Owner reports 76
2019-Q4 Owner reports 64
2020-Q1 Owner reports 53
2020-Q2 Owner reports 33
2020-Q3 Owner reports 45
2020-Q4 Owner reports 40
2021-Q1 Owner reports 46
2021-Q2 Owner reports 44
2021-Q3 Owner reports 33
2021-Q4 Owner reports 34
2022-Q1 Owner reports 45
2022-Q2 Owner reports 32
2022-Q3 Owner reports 52
2022-Q4 Owner reports 42
2023-Q1 Owner reports 52
2023-Q2 Owner reports 26
2023-Q3 Owner reports 60
2023-Q4 Owner reports 35
2024-Q1 Owner reports 49
2024-Q2 Owner reports 78
2024-Q3 Owner reports 74
2024-Q4 Owner reports 52
2025-Q1 Owner reports 69
2025-Q2 Owner reports 82
2025-Q3 Owner reports 55
2025-Q4 Owner reports 36
2026-Q1 Owner reports 41
2026-Q2 Owner reports 48
2026-Q3 Owner reports 31
2026-Q4 Owner reports 5
Recall campaign 1 16V345000
Recall campaign 1 19V075000
Recall campaign 1 19V433000
Defect investigation 1 PE13018
Defect investigation 1 PE16003
Defect investigation 1 RQ17010
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-10-15 Open source record

Safety Recalls (3)

Official campaigns. Each one says what could go wrong and what the dealer was told to fix.

In short, these campaigns were filed about Brakes and Transmission / driveline.

  1. Recall campaign 16V345000

    Brakes

    Report date
    Component:
    Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
    Consequence:
    Loss of brake fluid from the primary reservoir results in a complete loss of front brake function, increasing the risk of a crash.
    Remedy:
    Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the brake master cylinder and, if necessary, the brake booster, free of charge. The recall began on October 28, 2016. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 16S24.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  2. Recall campaign 19V075000

    Transmission / driveline

    Report date
    Component:
    Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN)
    Consequence:
    Unexpectedly downshifting into first gear may result in a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
    Remedy:
    Ford will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the powertrain control module, free of charge. The recall began March 4, 2019. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 19S07.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  3. Recall campaign 19V433000

    Transmission / driveline

    Report date
    Component:
    Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN)
    Consequence:
    Unexpectedly downshifting into first gear may result in a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
    Remedy:
    Ford will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the powertrain control module, free of charge. The recall began June 24, 2019. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 19S19.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-10-14 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

What owners actually wrote

Short excerpts from the public NHTSA file. Look for the same symptom repeating.

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-10-14
Safety incident filters
Showing 5 of 2,984 complaints · page 1 of 120
2026-10-07Engine (ENGINE)
NHTSA ODI 11769688
CrashFireInjuryDeath
I am submitting this complaint because my 2013 Ford F-150 3.5L EcoBoost developed a serious and potentially life-threatening engine defect that placed me and my family in immediate danger. While traveling on a major interstate/highway, the engine warning light and wrench light illuminated, and the truck subsequently lost power and stalled while I was driving. This occurred in active highway traffic, creating an extremely dangerous situation. My family and I were almost killed because the vehicle unexpectedly lost propulsion while we were traveling at highway speed and surrounded by other vehicles. The defect is especially hazardous because the failure can occur without providing a safe opportunity to move the vehicle out of traffic. An unexpected engine shutdown on a major interstate can leave the vehicle disabled in an active travel lane or in an unsafe location, exposing the occupants to a high risk of being struck by another vehicle. The loss of engine power also compromises the driver's ability to accelerate away from dangerous traffic situations. The condition is consistent with the **timing-component degradation and engine performance/stalling concerns described in Ford's technical-service information, including TSB 18-2305**, concerning the 3.5L EcoBoost engine. The timing components can deteriorate to the point that the engine experiences serious drivability problems and may stall. In my case, this was not merely a warning light or minor mechanical issue—the vehicle actually **stalled while being driven on a major interstate with my family inside**. This defect represents an immediate **hazardous safety condition** because an engine that unexpectedly stalls at highway speed can cause a driver to lose the ability to maintain speed, merge, maneuver, or safely remove the vehicle from traffic. The danger is substantially increased when children or family members are passengers. Ford is well aware of this defect. I am asking NHTSA to investigate
2026-10-06Brakes (SERVICE BRAKES)
NHTSA ODI 11769301
CrashFireInjuryDeath
Vehicle Information: 2013 Ford F-150 SuperCrew 3.5L V6 EcoBoost (VIN: [XXX]) While operating the vehicle, experienced a severe and sudden degradation of brake hydraulic pressure. The brake pedal travels abnormally deep and requires the driver to "double-pump" (fully let off the brake pedal and re-press it a second time) to achieve enough line pressure to stop the vehicle. Additionally, while stopped at an intersection, the vehicle began violently jerking and resisting movement because the brake calipers failed to release, holding the vehicle back until a heavy secondary press of the pedal forced the system to recede. Safety Risk & Background: This behavior matches the exact mechanical failure profile of Ford Safety Recall 16S24 and Recall 20S31 (internal failure of the brake master cylinder rear cup seal leaking corrosive fluid directly into the vacuum brake booster). I am the original owner of this vehicle from new. My exact VIN is currently excluded from the official recall database due to an early 2013 manufacture date boundary. However, the vehicle is suffering from the identical catastrophic failure of the identical under-recalled factory braking component, resulting in extreme deceleration failure and unintended brake lockup while moving. This constitutes an immediate crash hazard to my teenage driver that is currently operating this vehicle. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
2026-10-06Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM)
NHTSA ODI 11769296
CrashFireInjuryDeath
My truck is shifting erratically going from 5/6th gear down to 1st/2nd. It looses power. My battery light comes on, the wrench comes on, check engine light comes on but no codes come up. I have already put in a new transmission at my cost.
2026-10-05Transmission / driveline (POWER TRAIN)
NHTSA ODI 11769144
CrashFireInjuryDeath
The contact owns a 2013 Ford F-150. The contact stated that while driving 55 MPH, the transmission downshifted into first gear. The service vehicle soon warning light was illuminated and the vehicle was restarted and the contact continued driving. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed, and the contact was informed that the lead frame had failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The contact referenced NHTSA Campaign Number: 19V075000 (POWER TRAIN); as a possible cause for the failure. The failure mileage was 126,149.
2026-10-01Electrical (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM)
NHTSA ODI 11768220
CrashFireInjuryDeath
Was driving on the interstate and the speedometer stopped working, the truck shifted to first gear and entered limp home mode. This is a know issue with the lead frame and even though I only have 95k miles on the truck, ford only offered a 10 year extended warranty CSP 19N01 to cover it which has expired on time. This is a known issue and could have caused an accident on the interstate. This issue should be scheduled as a recall rather than an extended warranty that can expire. So because we do not drive the truck that often we are now being forced to pay for a known issue that Ford is aware of.

Ford F-150 Years With the Most NHTSA Complaints

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems on the 2013 Ford F-150?

Owners named Transmission / driveline most often — 1,102 of 2,984 reports (37%). That is the NHTSA file, not a diagnosis of every vehicle.

Are there recalls for the 2013 Ford F-150?

NHTSA lists 3 safety recall campaigns. They were filed about Brakes and Transmission / driveline. Check the VIN at nhtsa.gov; a campaign on this page can still be open on a specific vehicle.

What should I inspect before buying a 2013 Ford F-150?

Look up the VIN for open recalls. Have a shop drive it and check the transmission: hard or delayed shifts, burnt-smelling fluid, and 4WD engagement if equipped. Then skim owner filings for the same symptom and take that list to a mechanic.

Does a high complaint count mean I should skip this year?

No. Counts are reports people chose to file and they are not adjusted for sales volume. YearTell does not publish scores or a list of years to skip. Inspect the vehicle.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-10-04 Open source record

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-10-04
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-10-14 Open source record

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Source: NHTSA ODI / recalls, snapshot 2026-10-14. YearTell is not a government agency.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources