1992 FORD RANGER — Owner-Reported Problems

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Snapshot 2026-08-22 182 complaints · 5 recalls

Verdict & Safety Summary

Most-reported system: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (39 complaints · 21.4%)
Safety signals:
  • Crashes 13
  • Fires 32
  • Injuries 14
  • Deaths 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-08-22 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Component Problem Distribution

Share of owner complaints filed for each vehicle system (unaffected by sales volume)

Component Problem Distribution ELECTRICAL SYSTEM appears in 39 of 182 owner complaints (21.4%) in this vehicle snapshot. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: 39 complaints, 21.4% of reports ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 39 · 21.4% · 29 fire reports SUSPENSION: 27 complaints, 14.8% of reports SUSPENSION 27 · 14.8% · 1 crash reports VISIBILITY: 19 complaints, 10.4% of reports VISIBILITY 19 · 10.4% SERVICE BRAKES: 14 complaints, 7.7% of reports SERVICE BRAKES 14 · 7.7% · 2 crash reports ENGINE: 13 complaints, 7.1% of reports ENGINE 13 · 7.1% STRUCTURE: 13 complaints, 7.1% of reports STRUCTURE 13 · 7.1% · 1 fire reports POWER TRAIN: 11 complaints, 6.0% of reports POWER TRAIN 11 · 6.0% FUEL SYSTEM: 8 complaints, 4.4% of reports FUEL SYSTEM 8 · 4.4% · 1 crash reports TIRES: 8 complaints, 4.4% of reports TIRES 8 · 4.4% · 1 crash reports UNKNOWN OR OTHER: 156 complaints, 85.7% of reports UNKNOWN OR OTHER 156 · 85.7% · 12 crash reports 29 fire reports 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

UNKNOWN OR OTHER is an NHTSA classification artifact and is always listed last.

View component data as a table
System / Component Complaints Share of Reports Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires)
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 39 21.4% 0 crashes · 29 fires
SUSPENSION 27 14.8% 1 crashes · 0 fires
VISIBILITY 19 10.4% 0 crashes · 0 fires
SERVICE BRAKES 14 7.7% 2 crashes · 0 fires
ENGINE 13 7.1% 0 crashes · 0 fires
STRUCTURE 13 7.1% 0 crashes · 1 fires
POWER TRAIN 11 6.0% 0 crashes · 0 fires
FUEL SYSTEM 8 4.4% 1 crashes · 0 fires
TIRES 8 4.4% 1 crashes · 0 fires
UNKNOWN OR OTHER 156 85.7% 12 crashes · 29 fires
NHTSA Consumer Complaints, NHTSA Safety Recalls, and NHTSA Defect Investigations Snapshot 2026-08-22 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Problem & Recall Timeline

Observed complaint volume and manufacturer recall actions over time

Problem & Recall Timeline Owner reports in this snapshot begin in Jan 1995; the first recall shown was reported in Jan 1992. 1995-Q1: 3 owner reports 3 1995-Q2: 6 owner reports 6 1995-Q3: 4 owner reports 4 1995-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 1996-Q1: 4 owner reports 4 1996-Q2: 8 owner reports 8 1996-Q3: 8 owner reports 8 1996-Q4: 9 owner reports 9 1997-Q1: 6 owner reports 6 1997-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 1997-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 1997-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 1998-Q1: 5 owner reports 5 1998-Q2: 2 owner reports 2 1998-Q3: 4 owner reports 4 1998-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 1999-Q1: 9 owner reports 9 1999-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 1999-Q3: 14 owner reports 14 1999-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2000-Q1: 7 owner reports 7 2000-Q2: 7 owner reports 7 2000-Q3: 9 owner reports 9 2000-Q4: 4 owner reports 4 2001-Q1: 6 owner reports 6 2001-Q2: 5 owner reports 5 2001-Q3: 6 owner reports 6 2001-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2002-Q1: 2 owner reports 2 2002-Q2: 3 owner reports 3 2002-Q3: 6 owner reports 6 2002-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2003-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2003-Q2: 8 owner reports 8 2003-Q3: 3 owner reports 3 2003-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2004-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2005-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2006-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2006-Q4: 2 owner reports 2 2007-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2007-Q4: 1 owner reports 1 2008-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2009-Q1: 1 owner reports 1 2009-Q2: 1 owner reports 1 2010-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2011-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 2015-Q3: 1 owner reports 1 Owner reports Jan 1992 Jul 2015 Recall campaign 92V006000 ◆ Recall campaign 92V006000 Recall campaign 96V024001 ◆ Recall campaign 96V024001 Recall campaign 98E010000 ◆ Recall campaign 98E010000 Recall campaign 00T005000 ◆ Recall campaign 00T005000 Recall campaign 06E026000 ◆ Recall campaign 06E026000 Investigation EA95018 ● Investigation EA95018
  • Campaign 96V024001 was reported 263 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
  • Campaign 98E010000 was reported 1,056 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
Date Record type Count Record identifier
1995-Q1 Owner reports 3
1995-Q2 Owner reports 6
1995-Q3 Owner reports 4
1995-Q4 Owner reports 4
1996-Q1 Owner reports 4
1996-Q2 Owner reports 8
1996-Q3 Owner reports 8
1996-Q4 Owner reports 9
1997-Q1 Owner reports 6
1997-Q2 Owner reports 3
1997-Q3 Owner reports 1
1997-Q4 Owner reports 2
1998-Q1 Owner reports 5
1998-Q2 Owner reports 2
1998-Q3 Owner reports 4
1998-Q4 Owner reports 4
1999-Q1 Owner reports 9
1999-Q2 Owner reports 1
1999-Q3 Owner reports 14
1999-Q4 Owner reports 2
2000-Q1 Owner reports 7
2000-Q2 Owner reports 7
2000-Q3 Owner reports 9
2000-Q4 Owner reports 4
2001-Q1 Owner reports 6
2001-Q2 Owner reports 5
2001-Q3 Owner reports 6
2001-Q4 Owner reports 1
2002-Q1 Owner reports 2
2002-Q2 Owner reports 3
2002-Q3 Owner reports 6
2002-Q4 Owner reports 1
2003-Q1 Owner reports 1
2003-Q2 Owner reports 8
2003-Q3 Owner reports 3
2003-Q4 Owner reports 1
2004-Q4 Owner reports 1
2005-Q1 Owner reports 1
2006-Q3 Owner reports 1
2006-Q4 Owner reports 2
2007-Q2 Owner reports 1
2007-Q4 Owner reports 1
2008-Q2 Owner reports 1
2009-Q1 Owner reports 1
2009-Q2 Owner reports 1
2010-Q3 Owner reports 1
2011-Q3 Owner reports 1
2015-Q3 Owner reports 1
Recall campaign 1 92V006000
Recall campaign 1 96V024001
Recall campaign 1 98E010000
Recall campaign 1 00T005000
Recall campaign 1 06E026000
Defect investigation 1 EA95018
NHTSA Safety Recalls Snapshot 2026-08-22 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Safety Recalls (5)

Official safety recall campaigns filed with NHTSA

  1. Manufacturer action

    Recall campaign 00T005000

    Report date
    Component:
    TIRES
    Consequence:
    IF THE TREAD SEPARATES FROM THE TIRE, THE DRIVER CAN LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A CRASH CAUSING INJURY OR DEATH.
    Remedy:
    THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON AUGUST 29, 2001. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS SHOULD CONTACT FIRESTONE CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  2. Manufacturer action

    Recall campaign 06E026000

    Report date
    Component:
    Not available in the source record
    Consequence:
    WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
    Remedy:
    PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  3. Manufacturer action

    Recall campaign 92V006000

    Report date
    Component:
    STRUCTURE
    Consequence:
    THE MALFUNCTION OF THE DOOR LATCH RELEASE CAN RESULT INTHREE DIFFERENT PROBLEMS: 1) THE DOOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE RELATCHED, 2) THEINSIDE DOOR HANDLE CAN BECOME INOPERATIVE, AND 3) THE DOOR COULD APPEAR TO BELATCHED WHEN IT IS NOT, ALLOWING THE DOOR TO OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY IF IT IS JARRED,AND INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE ADJACENT SEAT OCCUPANT.
    Remedy:
    REVISED DOOR RELEASE CABLES AND WATER SHIELDS WILL BE INSTALLED.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  4. Manufacturer action

    Recall campaign 96V024001

    Report date
    Component:
    SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
    Consequence:
    IF A CRACK OCCURS, IT COULD RESULT IN ONE OR BOTH STUDS FRACTURING. THE MASTER CYLINDER COULD THEN SEPARATE FROM THE VACUUM BOOSTER, WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED, PREVENTING THE SERVICE BRAKES FROM ACTIVATING INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
    Remedy:
    DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE POWER BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER ASSEMBLY.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
  5. Manufacturer action

    Recall campaign 98E010000

    Report date
    Component:
    SERVICE BRAKES, AIR
    Consequence:
    LOSS OF BRAKING CAN RESULT.
    Remedy:
    AIMCO WILL REIMBURSE CONSUMERS/INSTALLERS FOR THE COST OF REPLACEMENT ROTORS AND INSTALLATION. CONSUMERS ARE REQUESTED TO RETURN TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE ROTORS WERE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED/INSTALLED FOR REPLACEMENT.
    View authoritative NHTSA record →
NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-08-22 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Complaint Narrative Explorer

Verbatim owner-reported defect narratives from NHTSA public records

Data: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation · snapshot 2026-08-22
Safety incident filters
Showing 0 of 182 complaints · page 1 of 8

No complaints match the current filters.

EPA Fuel Economy Database Snapshot 2026-08-21 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Estimated Ownership Cost

EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates

Data: US EPA Fuel Economy Guide · snapshot 2026-08-21
Supported range: 1,000–60,000 miles per year
Supported range: $1.50–$10.00 per gallon
55% city45% highway
Estimate unavailable

EPA fuel-economy data is unavailable for this vehicle.

No estimate is shown when required EPA values are unavailable.

Open Ownership Cost Calculator →

Adjacent Model Years

Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records

NHTSA Consumer Complaints Snapshot 2026-08-22 Open source record Read our complete data methodology →

Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.

Methodology & Data Integrity

Data sourced from NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. Snapshot date: 2026-08-22.

Read our complete data methodology → Sources