1994 FORD RANGER — Owner-Reported Problems
Verdict & Safety Summary
- Crashes 53
- Fires 15
- Injuries 25
- Deaths 1
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Component Problem Distribution
Share of owner complaints filed for each vehicle system (unaffected by sales volume)
UNKNOWN OR OTHER is an NHTSA classification artifact and is always listed last.
View component data as a table
| System / Component | Complaints | Share of Reports | Safety Reports (Crashes / Fires) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERVICE BRAKES | 63 | 15.7% | 12 crashes · 0 fires |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 58 | 14.4% | 0 crashes · 3 fires |
| POWER TRAIN | 44 | 10.9% | 5 crashes · 0 fires |
| PARKING BRAKE | 40 | 9.9% | 16 crashes · 0 fires |
| SUSPENSION | 24 | 6.0% | 1 crashes · 0 fires |
| TIRES | 22 | 5.5% | 4 crashes · 0 fires |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 21 | 5.2% | 1 crashes · 6 fires |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 21 | 5.2% | 2 crashes · 0 fires |
| ENGINE | 19 | 4.7% | 0 crashes · 2 fires |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 353 | 87.8% | 50 crashes · 12 fires |
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Problem & Recall Timeline
Observed complaint volume and manufacturer recall actions over time
- Campaign 96V024001 was reported 391 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 98E010000 was reported 1,184 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 00T005000 was reported 13 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 08E050000 was reported 4,943 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
- Campaign 09E025000 was reported 5,216 days after the first earlier complaint mapped to its component.
View timeline records as a table
| Date | Record type | Count | Record identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-Q1 | Owner reports | 35 | |
| 1995-Q2 | Owner reports | 16 | |
| 1995-Q3 | Owner reports | 15 | |
| 1995-Q4 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1996-Q1 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1996-Q2 | Owner reports | 12 | |
| 1996-Q3 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1996-Q4 | Owner reports | 10 | |
| 1997-Q1 | Owner reports | 12 | |
| 1997-Q2 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 1997-Q3 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 1997-Q4 | Owner reports | 6 | |
| 1998-Q1 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 1998-Q2 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 1998-Q3 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 1998-Q4 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 1999-Q1 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 1999-Q2 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 1999-Q3 | Owner reports | 6 | |
| 1999-Q4 | Owner reports | 8 | |
| 2000-Q1 | Owner reports | 9 | |
| 2000-Q2 | Owner reports | 9 | |
| 2000-Q3 | Owner reports | 13 | |
| 2000-Q4 | Owner reports | 15 | |
| 2001-Q1 | Owner reports | 12 | |
| 2001-Q2 | Owner reports | 6 | |
| 2001-Q3 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2001-Q4 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2002-Q1 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2002-Q2 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 2002-Q3 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2002-Q4 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2003-Q1 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2003-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2003-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2003-Q4 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2004-Q1 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2004-Q2 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2004-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2004-Q4 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2005-Q1 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2005-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2005-Q3 | Owner reports | 7 | |
| 2005-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2006-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2006-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2006-Q3 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2006-Q4 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2007-Q1 | Owner reports | 4 | |
| 2007-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2007-Q4 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2008-Q2 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2008-Q3 | Owner reports | 5 | |
| 2009-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2009-Q3 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2009-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2010-Q1 | Owner reports | 3 | |
| 2010-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2010-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2011-Q1 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2011-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2011-Q3 | Owner reports | 2 | |
| 2011-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2012-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2012-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2012-Q3 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2013-Q3 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2013-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2014-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2014-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2015-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2015-Q3 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2016-Q1 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2016-Q2 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2016-Q3 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2017-Q4 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| 2019-Q3 | Owner reports | 1 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 94V111001 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 94V169001 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 95V231001 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 96V024001 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 98E010000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 00T005000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 06E026000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 08E050000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 09E012000 | |
| Recall campaign | 1 | 09E025000 | |
| Defect investigation | 1 | EA95018 |
Safety Recalls (10)
Official safety recall campaigns filed with NHTSA
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 00T005000
- Report date
- Component:
- TIRES
- Consequence:
- IF THE TREAD SEPARATES FROM THE TIRE, THE DRIVER CAN LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A CRASH CAUSING INJURY OR DEATH.
- Remedy:
- THE REPLACEMENT/REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS CAMPAIGN EXPIRED ON AUGUST 29, 2001. HOWEVER, CUSTOMERS SHOULD CONTACT FIRESTONE CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR POSSIBLE ASSISTANCE.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 06E026000
- Report date
- Component:
- Not available in the source record
- Consequence:
- WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.
- Remedy:
- PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 08E050000
- Report date
- Component:
- EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Consequence:
- WITHOUT THE AMBER SIDE REFLEX REFLECTORS, THE LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY BE AFFECTED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy:
- K2 MOTOR WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND. THE RECALL BEGAN ON DECEMEBER 17, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT K2 MOTOR AT 1-909-839-2992.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 09E012000
- Report date
- Component:
- Not available in the source record
- Consequence:
- DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy:
- SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 09E025000
- Report date
- Component:
- EXTERIOR LIGHTING
- Consequence:
- DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
- Remedy:
- DOPE, INC. WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 28, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT DOPE, INC. AT 1-626-272-1798.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 94V111001
- Report date
- Component:
- FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
- Consequence:
- LEAKING FUEL CAN RESULT IN A FIRE WHEN EXPOSED TO A SOURCE OF IGNITION.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND, IF NECESSARY, REPLACE THE FRONT FUEL LINE ASSEMBLY.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 94V169001
- Report date
- Component:
- PARKING BRAKE
- Consequence:
- WHEN THE ABOVE OCCURS, IT CAN RESULT IN PARKING BRAKE SYSTEM INEFFECTIVENESS. THE PARKING BRAKE WILL NOT HOLD THE VEHICLE, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO ROLL FREELY, IF THE TRANSMISSION IS NOT LEFT IN GEAR.
- Remedy:
- A WEDGE WILL BE INSTALLED WHICH WILL SERVE TO LOCK THE PARKING BRAKE SELF-ADJUST MECHANISM PAWL INTO ENGAGEMENT WITH THE RACHET. ALSO, OWNERS WILL BE ADVISED TO RELEASE AND REAPPLY THE PARKING BRAKE WHENEVER TOOTH SKIP OCCURS AND WILL BE REMINDED TO ALWAYS TURN OFF THE ENGINE AND LEAVE THE VEHICLE IN GEAR WHEN THE VEHICLE IS PARKED.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 95V231001
- Report date
- Component:
- Not available in the source record
- Consequence:
- THE VEHICLE STOPPING DISTANCES CAN BE INCREASED POSSIBLY RESULTING IN AN ACCIDENT.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE AIR INTAKE DUCT AND VALVE ASSEMBLY WITH REVISED UNITS.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 96V024001
- Report date
- Component:
- SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
- Consequence:
- IF A CRACK OCCURS, IT COULD RESULT IN ONE OR BOTH STUDS FRACTURING. THE MASTER CYLINDER COULD THEN SEPARATE FROM THE VACUUM BOOSTER, WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED, PREVENTING THE SERVICE BRAKES FROM ACTIVATING INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
- Remedy:
- DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE POWER BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER ASSEMBLY.
-
Manufacturer action
Recall campaign 98E010000
- Report date
- Component:
- SERVICE BRAKES, AIR
- Consequence:
- LOSS OF BRAKING CAN RESULT.
- Remedy:
- AIMCO WILL REIMBURSE CONSUMERS/INSTALLERS FOR THE COST OF REPLACEMENT ROTORS AND INSTALLATION. CONSUMERS ARE REQUESTED TO RETURN TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE ROTORS WERE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED/INSTALLED FOR REPLACEMENT.
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Complaint Narrative Explorer
Verbatim owner-reported defect narratives from NHTSA public records
Estimated Ownership Cost
EPA fuel economy ratings and annual operating cost estimates
Adjacent Model Years
Immediate preceding and succeeding model year records
Complaint counts reflect self-selected reports and are not normalised for production sales volume. We publish no reliability scores, superlatives, or vehicle rankings.
Methodology & Data Integrity
Data sourced from NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. Snapshot date: 2026-08-22.